Cerence Inc. et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al
| Cerence Inc. and Cerence Operating Company |
| Microsoft Corporation and Nuance Communications, Inc. |
| 1:2025cv00553 |
| May 6, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Richard G Andrews |
| Copyright |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #23 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint filed by Cerence Inc., Cerence Operating Company.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 11/7/2025. (Mayo, Andrew)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #25 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time (*Reset Briefing Schedule: re #23 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. Answering Brief due 10/31/2025). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 10/3/2025. (nms)
|
|
Filing 25
STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time - filed by Cerence Inc., Cerence Operating Company. (Mayo, Andrew) Modified on 10/3/2025 (nms).
|
|
Filing 24
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #23 MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, filed by Microsoft Corporation, Nuance Communications, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/10/2025. (Gaza, Anne) Modified on 9/26/2025 (nms).
|
|
Filing 23
MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint - filed by Microsoft Corporation, Nuance Communications, Inc.. (Gaza, Anne) Modified on 9/26/2025 (nms).
|
|
Filing 22
STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time - filed by Microsoft Corporation, Nuance Communications, Inc.. (Gaza, Anne) Modified on 8/13/2025 (nms).
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #22 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Microsoft Corporation answer due 9/26/2025; Nuance Communications, Inc. answer due 9/26/2025). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/11/2025. (aas) Modified on 8/13/2025 (nms).
|
|
Filing 21
FIRST Amended Complaint against Microsoft Corporation and Nuance Communications, Inc. - filed by Cerence Operating Company, Cerence Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Mayo, Andrew) Modified on 8/4/2025 (nms).
|
|
Filing 20
SO ORDERED Granting #19 STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time (*Reset Briefing Schedule: re #17 MOTION to Dismiss. Answering Brief due 9/5/2025). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/23/2025. (nms)
|
|
Filing 19
STIPULATION and Proposed Order to Extend Time - filed by Cerence Inc., Cerence Operating Company. (Mayo, Andrew) Modified on 7/23/2025 (nms).
|
|
Filing 18
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #17 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Microsoft Corporation, Nuance Communications, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 7/25/2025. (Gaza, Anne) Modified on 7/14/2025 (nms).
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to Dismiss - filed by Microsoft Corporation, Nuance Communications, Inc.. (Gaza, Anne) Modified on 7/14/2025 (nms).
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Susan J. Kohlmann & Cayman C. Mitchell for Microsoft Corporation & Nuance Communications, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk)
|
|
Filing 16
Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Susan J. Kohlmann and Cayman C. Mitchell. ( re #14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Susan J. Kohlmann and Cayman C. Mitchell )( Payment of $ 100, receipt number ADEDC-4730814).(Gaza, Anne)
|
|
Filing 15
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Microsoft Corporation for Nuance Communications, Inc., filed by Microsoft Corporation, Nuance Communications, Inc.. (Gaza, Anne) Modified on 7/11/2025 (nms).
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Susan J. Kohlmann and Cayman C. Mitchell - filed by Microsoft Corporation, Nuance Communications, Inc.. (Gaza, Anne)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel G. Mackrides on behalf of Microsoft Corporation, Nuance Communications, Inc. (Mackrides, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by Anne Shea Gaza on behalf of Microsoft Corporation, Nuance Communications, Inc. (Gaza, Anne)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Susan J. Kohlmann and Cayman C. Mitchell filed by Nuance Communications, Inc., Microsoft Corporation. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/10/2025. (aas)
|
|
Filing 11
STIPULATED Order to Extend Time - filed by Cerence Inc., Cerence Operating Company. (Mayo, Andrew) Modified on 5/23/2025 (nms).
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #11 STIPULATED Order to Extend Time (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Microsoft Corporation answer due 7/11/2025; Nuance Communications, Inc. answer due 7/11/2025). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/23/2025. (nms)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Gazal Pour-Moezzi for Cerence Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (cdd)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Brian M. Daucher for Cerence Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (cdd)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Edwin Komen for Cerence Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (cdd)
|
|
Filing 10
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Summons served on Microsoft Corporation via Corporation Service Company (registered agent) on May 6, 2025, filed by Cerence Inc., Cerence Operating Company. (Mayo, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 9
Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Brian M. Daucher, Gazal Pour-Moezzi, and Edwin Komen. ( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4686875).(Mayo, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian M. Daucher, Gazal Pour-Moezzi, and Edwin Komen - filed by Cerence Inc., Cerence Operating Company. (Mayo, Andrew)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (nmf)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian M. Daucher, Gazal Pour-Moezzi, and Edwin Komen filed by Cerence Operating Company, Cerence Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/14/2025. (aas)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cerence Operating Company, Cerence Inc..Nuance Communications, Inc. served on 5/6/2025, answer due 5/27/2025. (Mayo, Andrew)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Issued as to Microsoft Corporation on 5/6/2025; Nuance Communications, Inc. on 5/6/2025. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued)(cdd)
|
|
Filing 5
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Cerence Inc. (cdd)
|
|
Filing 4
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Cerence Inc. for Cerence Operating Company filed by Cerence Operating Company. (cdd)
|
|
Filing 3
Report to the Register of Copyrights for Copyright Number(s)TXu 2-482-827. (cdd)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (cdd)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Microsoft Corporation, Nuance Communications, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4679820) - filed by Cerence Operating Company, Cerence Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(cdd)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
