DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. Teradata Corporation
Plaintiff: DataCloud Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Teradata Corporation
Case Number: 1:2025cv00559
Filed: May 6, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Gregory B Williams
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2025 Filing 12 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks. (lnb)
July 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SO ORDERED, re #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 7/16/2025. (lnb)
July 14, 2025 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by DataCloud Technologies, LLC as to Teradata Corporation (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
July 3, 2025 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 Unopposed MOTION to Stay All Deadlines filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC, Case stayed. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 7/3/2025. (lnb)
July 2, 2025 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Stay All Deadlines - filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
May 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SO ORDERED, re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to the Complaint to July 2, 2025 filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 5/22/2025. (lnb)
May 20, 2025 Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to respond to the Complaint to July 2, 2025 - filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
May 14, 2025 Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:25-cv-00558-UNA, 1:25-cv-00559-UNA(nmf)
May 13, 2025 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC.Teradata Corporation served on 5/12/2025, answer due 6/2/2025. (Stamoulis, Stamatios)
May 7, 2025 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Teradata Corporation on 5/7/2025. (scs)
May 6, 2025 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Brainbox Innovations, LLC for DataCloud Technologies, LLC filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (scs)
May 6, 2025 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,560,613 B1; US 6,651,063 B1; US 7,209,959 B1; US 7,398,298 B2. (scs)
May 6, 2025 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (scs)
May 6, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Teradata Corporation (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4680304) - filed by DataCloud Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(scs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. Teradata Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DataCloud Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Stamatios Stamoulis
Represented By: Richard Charles Weinblatt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Teradata Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?