Curtis v. Anderson et al
| Gawain T. Curtis |
| Rebecca E. Anderson, Christopher Bradley, Matt Blackmen, Susan Pegram, Ned Gladfelter, Ashley Cox, Jason Berry, Clara Conn and John J. Adams |
| 1:2025cv00584 |
| May 12, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by John J. Adams, Jason Berry, Matt Blackmen. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Rana, Sehr) Modified on 10/14/2025 (dlw). |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gawain T. Curtis. Jason Berry served on 5/21/2025, answer due 6/11/2025. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt)(cdd) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gawain T. Curtis. Christopher Bradley served on 5/21/2025, answer due 6/11/2025. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt)(cdd) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gawain T. Curtis. Matt Blackmen served on 5/21/2025, answer due 6/11/2025. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt)(cdd) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gawain T. Curtis. Ashley Cox served on 5/21/2025, answer due 6/11/2025. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt)(cdd) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gawain T. Curtis. Susan Pegram served on 5/20/2025, answer due 6/10/2025. (cdd) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gawain T. Curtis. Rebecca E. Anderson served on 5/20/2025, answer due 6/10/2025. (cdd) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gawain T. Curtis. Ned Gladfelter served on 5/20/2025, answer due 6/10/2025. (cdd) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gawain T. Curtis. John J. Adams served on 5/20/2025, answer due 6/10/2025. (cdd) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gawain T. Curtis. Clara Conn served on 5/20/2025, answer due 6/10/2025. (cdd) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to John J. Adams on 5/14/2025; Rebecca E. Anderson on 5/14/2025; Jason Berry on 5/14/2025; Matt Blackmen on 5/14/2025; Christopher Bradley on 5/14/2025; Clara Conn on 5/14/2025; Ashley Cox on 5/14/2025; Ned Gladfelter on 5/14/2025; Susan Pegram on 5/14/2025. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 Summons Issued, #3 Summons Issued, #4 Summons Issued, #5 Summons Issued, #6 Summons Issued, #7 Summons Issued, #8 Summons Issued)(mrr) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (nmf) |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Rule 4 Packet. Acknowledgment filed by Gawain T. Curtis. (cdd) |
| Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Magistrate Consent documents. Acknowledgment filed by Gawain T. Curtis. (cdd) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (cdd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against Rebecca E. Anderson, John J. Adams, Jason Berry, Matt Blackmen, Christopher Bradley, Clara Conn, Ashley Cox, Ned Gladfelter, Susan Pegram (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 4038) - filed by Gawain T. Curtis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-4, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(cdd) |
| No Summons Issued. (cdd) |
| Remark: Plaintiff was provided a pro se privacy notice and summons' documents to return to us for issuance at a later date. (cdd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
