Washington v. Emig et al
| Michael T. Washington |
| Brian Emig, Marvin M. Meija, Robert Heishman, John Breenan, Matthew Scott and Andrew Peruchi |
| 1:2025cv00684 |
| June 3, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re John Breenan, Brian Emig, Robert Heishman, Marvin M. Meija, Andrew Peruchi, Matthew Scott: Entry of appearance of attorney Lorin Huerta. Attorney Julia Mayer terminated. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Huerta, Lorin) |
| Filing 8 Plaintiff's Objection to #7 Notice of Substitution of Counsel - filed by Michael T. Washington. (scs) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re Brian Emig, Robert Heishman, Marvin M. Meija, Andrew Peruchi, Matthew Scott: Entry of appearance of attorney Julia Christina Mayer. Attorney Rebecca Bolinger terminated. (Mayer, Julia) |
Filing 6
DDOC-DDOJ 90 days Service Order: Plaintiff's motion for remand, appointment of counsel, and service instructions (D.I. #3 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Within ninety days from entry of this Service Order, Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff's allegation that "all the documents filed by the Plaintiff [were] not even attached with the Defendants['] notice of removal," (D.I. #4 at 1). DDOC Defendants shall have ninety (90) days from entry of this Service Order to file a Waiver of Service Executed and/or a Waiver of Service Unexecuted. Upon the electronic filing of the Waiver of Service Executed, DDOC Defendants shall have sixty (60) days to answer or otherwise respond to the pro se Complaint. See Order for further details. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/24/2025. ***Copy mailed to Pro Se Plaintiff*** (Attachments: #1 D.I. 1-1 Complaint) (mws)
|
| Filing 5 Letter to The Honorable Chief Judge Colm F. Connolly, from The Washington Family, Enclosing previously filed motions in the Superior Court of Delaware by Michael T. Washington and regarding District Court intervention. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Envelope)(cdd) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Order State Court to Transmit all Filings from the Superior Court Case, MOTION to Remand to State Court, and MOTION to Appoint Counsel - filed by Michael T. Washington. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(jfm) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Motion to Appoint Counsel - filed by Michael T. Washington. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(mrr) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL and copies of documents from DE Superior Court, Case Number N25C-04-103 SKR (Filing fee $405, receipt number ADEDC-4701620)- filed by Robert Heishman, John Breenan, Marvin M. Meija, Matthew Scott, Andrew Peruchi, Brian Emig. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb) |
| Remark: A Magistrate Consent Form, Acknowledgment of Receipt of Magistrate Consent form, and Pro-se Privacy Notice has been mailed to the Plaintiff. (mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
