Light v. Davis et al
Plaintiff: John Light
Defendant: The Honorable Colleen C. Davis and Brenda Mayrack, Esq.
Case Number: 1:2025cv00705
Filed: June 5, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 14 REPLY BRIEF re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6) filed by Brenda Mayrack, Esq. (Connolly, Arthur)
August 26, 2025 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #13 STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Time to File Reply Brief (*Reset Briefing Schedule: re #7 MOTION to Dismiss. Reply Brief due 9/19/2025). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/26/2025. (nms)
August 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Time to File Reply Brief - filed by Colleen C. Davis, Brenda Mayrack, Esq. (Connolly, Arthur) Modified on 8/26/2025 (nms).
August 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6) filed by John Light.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 8/29/2025. (Kittila, Theodore)
August 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Mark C. Rifkin, Esq. and Arthur Susman, Esq.. ( re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Arthur Susman, Esq., #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark C. Rifkin, Esq. )( Payment of $ 100, receipt number ADEDC-4771459).(Kittila, Theodore)
August 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Arthur Susman, Esq. - filed by John Light. (Kittila, Theodore)
August 20, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark C. Rifkin, Esq. - filed by John Light. (Kittila, Theodore)
August 20, 2025 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Arthur Susman, Esq. filed by John Light, #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark C. Rifkin, Esq. filed by John Light. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/20/2025. (aas)
July 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6), filed by Colleen C. Davis, Brenda Mayrack, Esq. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/8/2025. (Connolly, Arthur) Modified on 7/25/2025 (nms).
July 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rules 12(B)(1) and 12(B)(6) - filed by Colleen C. Davis, Brenda Mayrack, Esq. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Connolly, Arthur) Modified on 7/25/2025 (nms).
June 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint - filed by Colleen C. Davis, Brenda Mayrack, Esq. (Connolly, Arthur) Modified on 6/23/2025 (nms).
June 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Light.Brenda Mayrack, Esq served on 6/9/2025, answer due 6/30/2025. (Kittila, Theodore)
June 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by John Light.Colleen C. Davis served on 6/9/2025, answer due 6/30/2025. (Kittila, Theodore)
June 23, 2025 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #6 STIPULATION and Proposed Order Extending Time to Respond to Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Colleen C. Davis answer due 7/25/2025; Brenda Mayrack, Esq answer due 7/25/2025). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 6/23/2025. (nms)
June 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb)
June 6, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Kathleen Jennings, Attorney General of the State of Delaware on 6/6/2025. (oam) Modified on 6/6/2025 (nms).
June 6, 2025 Opinion or Order CORRECTING ENTRY: The docket text for D.I. #3 has been corrected to reflect Kathleen Jennings, Attorney General of the State of Delaware has been served not Defendant Collen C. Davis. (nms)
June 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (oam)
June 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Colleen C. Davis, Brenda Mayrack, Esq (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4704305) - filed by John Light. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(oam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Light v. Davis et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Light
Represented By: Theodore Allan Kittila
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Honorable Colleen C. Davis
Represented By: Arthur G. Connolly, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brenda Mayrack, Esq.
Represented By: Arthur G. Connolly, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?