Wasserman v. Baldwin, et al.
| Arlin Wasserman |
| William Newlands, Christopher Baldwin, Christy Clark, Jennifer Daniels, Nicholas Fink, Jose Manuel Madero Garza, William Giles, Garth Hankinson, Ernesto Hernandez, Daniel McCarthy, Bill Newlands, Richard Sands, Robert Sands, Judy A. Schmeling, Luca Zaramella and Constellation Brands, Inc. |
| 1:2025cv00779 |
| June 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Jennifer L Hall |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
SO ORDERED, re #6 Notice and Order of Voluntary Dismissal. (***Civil Case Terminated). Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 8/14/2025. (ceg)
|
| Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER of dismissal [Notice and [Proposed] Order of Voluntary Dismissal] by Arlin Wasserman. (deLeeuw, Peter) |
|
Filing 5
ORAL ORDER: WHEREAS, the Complaint purports to assert one federal claim: a derivative claim under Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act (Count II); WHEREAS, there are also three state law claims (Counts I, III, IV), and the Complaint alleges that this Court has original jurisdiction over the federal claim and supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims; WHEREAS, the Court doubts the merits of the Section 14(a) claim (Count II), as the Court does not understand how the allegations support a derivative claim; WHEREAS, the Court would decline to exercise jurisdiction over the state law claims if the federal claims are dismissed, see, e.g., Stone v. Martin, 720 F. App'x 132, 136 (3d Cir. 2017); WHEREAS, the parties have filed a stipulation (D.I. #3 ) asking the Court to stay the case pending resolution of certain proceedings in another case; and WHEREAS, the Court does not believe that the proposed course of action is appropriate under these circumstances and is concerned that the Complaint may represent an attempt to manufacture jurisdiction in this Court; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the proposed stipulation (D.I. #3 ) is REJECTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before August 11, 2025, Plaintiff must SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed for failure to state a ripe claim over which the Court has original jurisdiction. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 7/21/2025. (ceg)
|
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Constellation Brands, Inc.. (Hunter, Travis) |
| Filing 3 PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated and [Proposed] Scheduling Order by Christopher Baldwin, Christy Clark, Jennifer Daniels, Nicholas Fink, William Giles, Garth Hankinson, Ernesto Hernandez, Jose Manuel Madero Garza, Daniel McCarthy, William Newlands, Richard Sands, Robert Sands, Judy A. Schmeling, Luca Zaramella. (Hunter, Travis) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (jfm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Christopher Baldwin, Christy Clark, Jennifer Daniels, Nicholas Fink, William Giles, Garth Hankinson, Ernesto Hernandez, Jose Manuel Madero Garza, Daniel McCarthy, William Newlands, Richard Sands, Robert Sands, Judy A. Schmeling, Luca Zaramella (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4717715) - filed by Arlin Wasserman. (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jfm) |
| No Summons Issued. (jfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
