Conexus LLC v. Rapid7, Inc.
Plaintiff: Conexus LLC
Defendant: Rapid7, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2025cv00891
Filed: July 17, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Jennifer L Hall
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2025 Filing 19 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,812,497. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal)(ceg)
October 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 18 SO ORDERED, re #17 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice. (***Civil Case Terminated). Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 10/21/2025. (ceg)
October 15, 2025 Filing 17 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Conexus LLC as to without prejudice (Garibian, Antranig)
October 3, 2025 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Ruben J. Rodrigues for Rapid7, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk)
September 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER re #15 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint to November 12, 2025. (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Rapid7, Inc. answer due 11/12/2025). Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 9/30/2025. (ceg)
September 30, 2025 Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint to November 12, 2025 - filed by Rapid7, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Haynes, Christine)
September 30, 2025 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #13 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ruben J. Rodrigues filed by Rapid7, Inc. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 9/30/2025. (ceg)
September 29, 2025 Filing 14 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Ruben J. Rodrigues. ( re #13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ruben J. Rodrigues )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4800866).(Haynes, Christine)
September 29, 2025 Filing 13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ruben J. Rodrigues - filed by Rapid7, Inc.. (Haynes, Christine)
September 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint to October 10, 2025. (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Rapid7, Inc. answer due 10/10/2025). Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 9/3/2025. (ceg)
September 2, 2025 Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION to extend time to to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) through and including October 10, 2025 - filed by Rapid7, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Haynes, Christine)
August 12, 2025 Filing 10 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Rapid7, Inc.. (Haynes, Christine)
August 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Complaint to September 10, 2025. (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Rapid7, Inc. answer due 9/10/2025). Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 8/12/2025. (ceg)
August 12, 2025 DEFICIENCY NOTICE issued by the Court to Defendant: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 (b)(1), A party must: (1) file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Counsel is requested to supplement the docket with an appropriate Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (ceg)
August 11, 2025 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint to September 10, 2025 - filed by Rapid7, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Haynes, Christine)
August 11, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine Dealy Haynes on behalf of Rapid7, Inc. (Haynes, Christine)
July 23, 2025 Case Assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:25-cv-00889-UNA et al. (alb)
July 21, 2025 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Conexus LLC.Rapid7, Inc. served on 7/21/2025, answer due 8/11/2025. (Garibian, Antranig)
July 18, 2025 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Rapid7, Inc. on 7/18/2025. (oam)
July 17, 2025 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Conexus LLC. (oam)
July 17, 2025 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,812,497. (oam)
July 17, 2025 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (oam)
July 17, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Rapid7, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4736593) - filed by Conexus LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(oam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conexus LLC v. Rapid7, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Conexus LLC
Represented By: Antranig N. Garibian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rapid7, Inc.
Represented By: Christine Dealy Haynes
Represented By: Ruben J. Rodrigues
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?