Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC v. NETGEAR, Inc.
Plaintiff: Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC
Defendant: NETGEAR, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2025cv00894
Filed: July 17, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Gregory B Williams
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2026 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Dorian S. Berger & Erin E. McCracken for Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk)
January 9, 2026 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Daniel P. Hipskind for Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk)
December 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORAL ORDER: In light of the filing of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, D.I. 20, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, D.I. 13, as it relates to the Original Complaint, D.I. 1. See Caredx, Inc. v. Natera, Inc., Civ. No. 19-567-CFC, 2020 WL 8186462, at *1 (D. Del. Mar. 13, 2020) ("The filing of an amended complaint generally renders a pending motion to dismiss moot." (quoting Pippett v. Waterford Dev., LLC, 166 F. Supp. 2d 233, 236 (E.D. Pa. 2001))). ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 12/12/2025. (lnb)
November 26, 2025 Filing 20 First AMENDED COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against NETGEAR, Inc.- filed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23)(Brauerman, Stephen)
November 4, 2025 Filing 19 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. / Amended Civil Cover Sheet re: Related Cases. (Golden, Ronald)
November 3, 2025 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #18 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint, in lieu of Responding to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 13) to November 26, 2025 and for Defendant to Answer, Move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Compl filed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 11/3/2025. (lnb)
October 31, 2025 Filing 18 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint, in lieu of Responding to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 13) to November 26, 2025 and for Defendant to Answer, Move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint to January 26, 2026 - filed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. (Golden, Ronald)
October 31, 2025 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #16 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Daniel P. Hipskind, Erin E. McCracken, and Dorian S. Berger filed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 10/31/2025. (lnb)
October 30, 2025 Filing 17 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Daniel P. Hipskind, Erin E. McCracken, and Dorian S. Berger. ( re #16 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Daniel P. Hipskind, Erin E. McCracken, and Dorian S. Berger )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4826427).(Golden, Ronald)
October 30, 2025 Filing 16 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Daniel P. Hipskind, Erin E. McCracken, and Dorian S. Berger - filed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Daniel P. Hipskind, #2 Certification of Erin E. McCracken, #3 Certification of Dorian S. Berger)(Golden, Ronald)
October 28, 2025 Pro Hac Vice Attorney John R. Gibson for NETGEAR, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk)
October 28, 2025 Pro Hac Vice Attorney Tyler Marandola & Matthew S. Yungwirth for NETGEAR, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk)
October 27, 2025 Filing 15 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc. for NETGEAR, Inc. filed by NETGEAR, Inc.. (Squire, Monte)
October 27, 2025 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by NETGEAR, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 11/10/2025. (Squire, Monte)
October 27, 2025 Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by NETGEAR, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Squire, Monte)
September 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SO ORDERED, re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Matthew S. Yungwirth, John R. Gibson, and Tyler Marandola filed by NETGEAR, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 9/18/2025. (lnb)
September 17, 2025 Filing 11 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Matthew S. Yungwirth, John R. Gibson, and Tyler Marandola. ( re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Matthew S. Yungwirth, John R. Gibson, and Tyler Marandola )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4791309).(Squire, Monte)
September 17, 2025 Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Matthew S. Yungwirth, John R. Gibson, and Tyler Marandola - filed by NETGEAR, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certification of Matthew S. Yungwirth, #3 Certification of John R. Gibson, #4 Certification of Tyler Marandola)(Squire, Monte)
September 16, 2025 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #9 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to October 27, 2025 filed by NETGEAR, Inc.. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 9/16/2025. (lnb)
September 15, 2025 Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to October 27, 2025 - filed by NETGEAR, Inc.. (Squire, Monte)
September 15, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Monte Terrell Squire on behalf of NETGEAR, Inc. (Squire, Monte)
August 12, 2025 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to have Defendant NETGEAR, INC. respond to the Complaint to September 26, 2025 filed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 8/12/2025. (lnb)
August 5, 2025 Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to have Defendant NETGEAR, INC. respond to the Complaint to September 26, 2025 - filed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
July 23, 2025 Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:25-cv-00894-UNA, 1:25-cv-00912-UNA (alb)
July 18, 2025 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC.NETGEAR, Inc. served on 7/18/2025, answer due 8/8/2025. (Brauerman, Stephen)
July 18, 2025 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to NETGEAR, Inc. on 7/18/2025. (mpb)
July 17, 2025 Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. (mpb)
July 17, 2025 Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,675,570; 8,260,213; 8,238,832; 8,270,343 ; 8,213,870; 8,644,765 ; 9,083,401; 10,200,096; 8,238,859; 8,265,573; 9,596,648. (mpb)
July 17, 2025 Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb)
July 17, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against NETGEAR, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4736780) - filed by Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC v. NETGEAR, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Velocity Communication Technologies, LLC
Represented By: Ronald P. Golden, III
Represented By: Stephen B. Brauerman
Represented By: Erin E. McCracken
Represented By: Dorian S. Berger
Represented By: Daniel P. Hipskind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NETGEAR, Inc.
Represented By: Tyler Marandola
Represented By: Matthew S. Yungwirth
Represented By: John R. Gibson
Represented By: Monte Terrell Squire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?