Anderson v. Metlife Disability
| Roland C. Anderson |
| Metlife Disability |
| 1:2025cv01089 |
| August 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Stay re 8 ORAL Order - filed by Roland C. Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(scs) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to D.I. 8 Oral Order. - filed by Roland C. Anderson. (oam) |
Filing 8
ORAL ORDER: Having construed Plaintiff's response (D.I. 7) to the December 18, 2025 Order (D.I. 6) as a motion to vacate Order and reopen this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (D.I. 7) is DENIED without prejudice to renew on or before February 2, 2026. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any renewed motion to vacate the December 18, 2025 Order (D.I. 6) shall include a proposed amended complaint as an exhibit to the motion. ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 1/2/2026. *Copy of Oral Order mailed to Plaintiff's address on record. (jaa)
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Order re #6 CLERK'S ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER filed by Roland C. Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(oam) |
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER re #5 Memorandum and Order,, ***Civil Case Terminated. ***Copy mailed via USPS to Pro-Se Plaintiff at address of record.*** Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 12/18/2025. (lnb)
|
|
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Complaint (D.I. #2 ) is DISMISSED without prejudice to Plaintiff filing an amended complaint on or before December 1, 2025; and Should no amended complaint be timely filed, the Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case (See MEMORADNUM ORDER for Further Details). Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 10/30/2025. (cdd)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Granting #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis without prepaying fees or costs. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 09/08/2025. (oam)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (oam) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against Metlife Disability - filed by Roland C. Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Acknowledgement of Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(oam) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - filed by Roland C. Anderson #1 Exhibit 1) (oam). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Anderson v. Metlife Disability | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Roland C. Anderson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Metlife Disability | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
