Teratech Corporation v. Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
| Teratech Corporation doing business as Terason |
| Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd. doing business as Mindray Global and Mindray DS USA, Inc. doing business as Mindray North America |
| 1:2025cv01149 |
| September 15, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 REQUEST for Oral Argument by Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., Mindray DS USA, Inc. re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Morrison, Susan) |
| Filing 19 REPLY BRIEF re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., Mindray DS USA, Inc.. (Morrison, Susan) |
| Filing 18 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file Reply Brief in support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to February 3, 2026 - filed by Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., Mindray DS USA, Inc.. (Reeves, Taylor) |
SO ORDERED re #18 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file Reply Brief in support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to February 3, 2026 (Set Briefing Schedule: re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Reply Brief due 2/3/2026). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/22/2026. (dlw)
|
| Filing 17 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Teratech Corporation.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 1/27/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Silver, Daniel) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Qiuyi Wu for Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., and Mindray DS USA, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (jmn) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Frank E. Scherkenbach,Yun Dong for Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., and Mindray DS USA, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (jmn) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jeffrey A. Shneidman for Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., and Mindray DS USA, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (jmn) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jeremy T. Saks for Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., and Mindray DS USA, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (jmn) |
|
SO ORDERED re #16 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff Teratech Corp. d/b/a Terason to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 11) to January 20, 2026 (Set Briefing Schedule: re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Answering Brief due 1/20/2026). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/30/2025. (dlw)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff Teratech Corp. d/b/a Terason to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 11) to January 20, 2026 - filed by Teratech Corporation. (Joyce, Alexandra) |
|
SO ORDERED re #14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Frank E. Scherkenbach, Jeffrey A. Shneidman, Jeremy T. Saks, Qiuyi Wu, and Yun Dong filed by Mindray DS USA, Inc., Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 12/29/2025. (dlw)
|
| Filing 15 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Frank E. Scherkenbach, Jeffrey A. Shneidman, Jeremy T. Saks, Qiuyi Wu, and Yun Dong. ( re #14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Frank E. Scherkenbach, Jeffrey A. Shneidman, Jeremy T. Saks, Qiuyi Wu, and Yun Dong )( Payment of $ 250, receipt number ADEDC-4865181).(Morrison, Susan) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Frank E. Scherkenbach, Jeffrey A. Shneidman, Jeremy T. Saks, Qiuyi Wu, and Yun Dong - filed by Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., Mindray DS USA, Inc.. (Morrison, Susan) |
| Filing 13 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Ltd. for Mindray DS USA, Inc. filed by Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., Mindray DS USA, Inc.. (Morrison, Susan) |
| Filing 12 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., Mindray DS USA, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 1/6/2026. (Morrison, Susan) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., Mindray DS USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Morrison, Susan) |
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, - filed by Teratech Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Silver, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Teratech Corporation: For Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd. waiver sent on 9/24/2025, answer due 12/23/2025. (Silver, Daniel) |
|
SO ORDERED re #10 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Mindray DS USA, Inc. answer due 12/23/2025). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/26/2025. (dlw)
|
| Filing 8 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Leigh J. Martinson and Leah R. McCoy. ( re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Leigh J. Martinson and Leah R. McCoy )( Payment of $ 100, receipt number ADEDC-4791306).(Silver, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Leigh J. Martinson and Leah R. McCoy - filed by Teratech Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certifications for Leigh J. Martinson and Leah R. McCoy)(Silver, Daniel) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Leah R. McCoy for Teratech Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (cdd) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Leigh J. Martinson for Teratech Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
|
SO ORDERED re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Leigh J. Martinson and Leah R. McCoy filed by Teratech Corporation. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/17/2025. (dlw)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Teratech Corporation.Mindray DS USA, Inc. served on 9/16/2025, answer due 10/7/2025. (Silver, Daniel) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Mindray DS USA, Inc. on 9/16/2025. (oam) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Teratech Corporation. (oam) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 11,675,073; 12,102,480; 11,857,363; 12,115,023 ; 9,877,699. (oam) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (oam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd., Mindray DS USA, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4789418) - filed by Teratech Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E, #2 Exhibits F-M, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(oam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Teratech Corporation v. Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Teratech Corporation doing business as Terason | |
| Represented By: | Daniel M. Silver |
| Represented By: | Alexandra M. Joyce |
| Represented By: | Leigh J. Martinson |
| Represented By: | Leah R. McCoy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd. doing business as Mindray Global | |
| Represented By: | Yun Dong |
| Represented By: | Taylor Reeves |
| Represented By: | Qiuyi Wu |
| Represented By: | Jeremy T. Saks |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey A. Shneidman |
| Represented By: | Frank E. Scherkenbach |
| Represented By: | Susan E. Morrison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mindray DS USA, Inc. doing business as Mindray North America | |
| Represented By: | Yun Dong |
| Represented By: | Taylor Reeves |
| Represented By: | Qiuyi Wu |
| Represented By: | Jeremy T. Saks |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey A. Shneidman |
| Represented By: | Frank E. Scherkenbach |
| Represented By: | Susan E. Morrison |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
