SAP SE v. Celonis SE et al
| SAP SE |
| Celonis SE and Celonis, Inc. |
| 1:2025cv01229 |
| October 3, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Maeve P. Dineen for SAP SE added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
| Filing 30 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Maeve P. Dineen. ( re #29 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Maeve P. Dineen )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4929712).(Squire, Monte) |
| Filing 29 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Maeve P. Dineen - filed by SAP SE. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Maeve P. Dineen, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Squire, Monte) |
SO ORDERED re #29 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Maeve P. Dineen filed by SAP SE. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 3/23/2026. (dlw)
|
|
Filing 28
ORAL ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiff serves its opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at https://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 3/9/2026. (dlw)
|
| CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. 27 has been replaced on the docket. The line spacing is now truly double spaced and not 24-point. (dlw) |
| Filing 27 REPLY BRIEF re #23 PARTIAL MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc. (Mayo, Andrew) (Main Document 27 replaced on 3/9/2026) (dlw). Modified on 3/9/2026 (dlw). |
| Filing 26 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #23 PARTIAL MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by SAP SE. Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 3/5/2026. (Squire, Monte) Modified on 3/9/2026 (dlw). |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Hannah E. Mehrle for SAP SE added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Matthew R. Modderman for SAP SE added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Joseph M. Beauchamp for SAP SE added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Tharan Gregory Lanier for SAP SE added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
| Filing 25 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Celonis SE for Celonis, Inc. filed by Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc.. (Day, John) |
| Filing 24 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #23 PARTIAL MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/26/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Day, John) Modified on 3/9/2026 (dlw). |
| Filing 23 PARTIAL MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Day, John) Modified on 3/9/2026 (dlw). |
| Filing 22 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint (D.I. 19) to February 12, 2026 - filed by Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc.. (Mayo, Andrew) |
|
SO ORDERED re #22 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint (D.I. 19) to February 12, 2026 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Celonis SE answer due 2/12/2026; Celonis, Inc. answer due 2/12/2026). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/28/2026. (dlw)
|
|
Filing 21
ORAL ORDER re #16 PARTIAL MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - In light of Plaintiff's #19 First Amended Complaint, the Court DENIES as MOOT Defendants' #16 Partial Motion to Dismiss as it relates to the #1 Original Complaint. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/23/2026. (dlw)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Filing of First Amended Complaint by SAP SE re #19 Amended Complaint (Squire, Monte) |
| Filing 19 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc.- filed by SAP SE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A through H)(Squire, Monte) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/23/2026: #2 Redline Comparison) (dlw). |
| Filing 18 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to January 23, 2026 - filed by SAP SE. (Squire, Monte) |
|
SO ORDERED re #18 STIPULATION TO EXTENDING briefing schedule for partial motion to dismiss (Set Briefing Schedule: re #16 PARTIAL MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Answering Brief due 1/23/2026. Reply Brief due 2/6/2026). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 1/16/2026. (dlw)
|
| Filing 17 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #16 Partial MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 1/16/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Mayo, Andrew) Modified on 1/23/2026 (dlw). |
| Filing 16 PARTIAL MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mayo, Andrew) Modified on 1/5/2026 (dlw). |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by John G. Day on behalf of Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc. (Day, John) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Counsel and Entry of Appearance of Andrew C. Mayo by Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc. (Mayo, Andrew) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Gurtej Singh for Celonis SE & Celonis, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Isabella Bosetti, Christine Pinnkathok & David A. Perlson for Celonis SE & Celonis, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
| Filing 13 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Jennifer Fleury, Christine Pinnkathok, and Isabella Bosetti. ( re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David A. Perlson, Gurtej Singh, Celine J. Crowson, Jennifer Fleury, Christine Pinnkathok, and Isabella Bosetti )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4841493).(Mayo, Andrew) |
| Filing 12 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for David A. Perlson, Gurtej Singh, and Celine J. Crowson. ( re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David A. Perlson, Gurtej Singh, Celine J. Crowson, Jennifer Fleury, Christine Pinnkathok, and Isabella Bosetti )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4841489).(Mayo, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David A. Perlson, Gurtej Singh, Celine J. Crowson, Jennifer Fleury, Christine Pinnkathok, and Isabella Bosetti - filed by Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc.. (Biggs, Brian) |
|
SO ORDERED re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David A. Perlson, Gurtej Singh, Celine J. Crowson, Jennifer Fleury, Christine Pinnkathok, and Isabella Bosetti filed by Celonis, Inc., Celonis SE. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 11/19/2025. (dlw)
|
|
Filing 10
SO ORDERED re #9 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 2, 2026 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Celonis SE answer due 1/2/2026; Celonis, Inc. answer due 1/2/2026). Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/27/2025. (dlw)
|
| Filing 9 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 2, 2026 - filed by SAP SE. (Squire, Monte) |
| Filing 8 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Joseph M. Beauchamp, Tharan Gregory Lanier, Hannah Mehrle, and Matthew R. Modderman. ( re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph M. Beauchamp, Tharan Gregory Lanier, Hannah Mehrle, and Matthew R. Modderman )( Payment of $ 200, receipt number ADEDC-4810059).(Squire, Monte) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph M. Beauchamp, Tharan Gregory Lanier, Hannah Mehrle, and Matthew R. Modderman - filed by SAP SE. (Attachments: #1 Certification of Joseph M. Beauchamp, Esquire, #2 Certification of Tharan Gregory Lanier, Esquire, #3 Certification of Hannah Mehrle, Esquire, #4 Certification of Matthew R. Modderman, Esquire, #5 Text of Proposed Order)(Squire, Monte) |
|
SO ORDERED re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph M. Beauchamp, Tharan Gregory Lanier, Hannah Mehrle, and Matthew R. Modderman filed by SAP SE. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/9/2025. (dlw)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SAP SE.Celonis, Inc. served on 10/7/2025, answer due 10/28/2025. (Squire, Monte) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Celonis SE on 10/6/2025 and Celonis, Inc. on 10/6/2025. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued Celonis, Inc.)(jfm) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed - filed by SAP SE. (jfm) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,996,492; 9,697,254; 11,120,034; 11,514,007. (jfm) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (jfm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Celonis SE, Celonis, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4805571) - filed by SAP SE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-G, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
