Eurofins Viracor BioPharma Services, LLC v. Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.
| Eurofins Viracor BioPharma Services, LLC |
| Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2025cv01261 |
| October 15, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re #19 MOTION to Amend/Correct #9 Notice (Other) MOTION OF DEFENDANT HAMILTON STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TO AMEND ITS AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL DEFENDANTS REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO AMEND THE AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification Pursuant to Standing Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Loomis, Gaston) |
| Filing 23 Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Leslie Spoltore regarding Courtesy Copies of Filings - re #22 Reply Brief, #21 Answering Brief in Opposition,. (Spoltore, Leslie) |
| Filing 22 REPLY BRIEF re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Eurofins Viracor BioPharma Services, LLC. (Spoltore, Leslie) |
| Filing 21 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #19 MOTION to Amend/Correct #9 Notice (Other) MOTION OF DEFENDANT HAMILTON STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TO AMEND ITS AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Eurofins Viracor BioPharma Services, LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 12/15/2025. (Spoltore, Leslie) |
| Filing 20 STATEMENT re #19 MOTION to Amend/Correct #9 Notice (Other) MOTION OF DEFENDANT HAMILTON STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TO AMEND ITS AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL Rule 7.1.1 Statement by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Loomis, Gaston) |
| DEFICIENCY NOTICE by the Court issued to Defendant re #18 Response to Motion: Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order Regarding Briefing in All Cases, dated November 10, 2022, "[t]he covers of briefs filed in connection with all motions except for motions in limine included in a pretrial order shall be as follows: i. Opening Brief - Blue; ii. Answering Brief - Red; iii. Reply Brief - Gray." Courtesy copies of D.I. #18 are not in compliance with the Court's standing order. Please resubmit courtesy copies of your brief with the corrected covers. (mws) |
| Filing 19 MOTION to Amend/Correct #9 Notice (Other) MOTION OF DEFENDANT HAMILTON STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TO AMEND ITS AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL - filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Second Amended Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Text of Proposed Order, #5 Certification Pursuant to Standing Order, #6 Certificate of Service)(Loomis, Gaston) |
| Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court OBJECTION OF DEFENDANT HAMILTON STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. TO THE MOTION TO REMAND filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certification Pursuant to Standing Order, #2 Certificate of Service)(Loomis, Gaston) |
| LOCAL RULE 7.1.1 NOTICE: In accordance with Local Rule 7.1.1, except for civil cases involving pro se parties or motions brought by nonparties, every nondispositive motion shall be accompanied by an averment of counsel for the moving party that a reasonable effort has been made to reach agreement with the opposing party on the matters set forth in the motion. Unless otherwise ordered, failure to so aver may result in dismissal of the motion. The records of this case do not reflect such an averment by counsel for D.I. #19 . Please file the averment using the event code STATEMENT, found under OTHER DOCUMENTS. (mws) |
Filing 17
SO ORDERED, re #16 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME APPLICABLE TO THE MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION TO DISMISS. Reset Briefing Schedule: re #10 MOTION to Remand to State Court: Answering Brief due 11/24/2025; Reply Brief due 12/8/2025. Plaintiff's deadline to respond to the Motion to Dismiss shall be adjourned to the date that is fourteen (14) days after the Court enters an order on the Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/10/2025. (mws)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME APPLICABLE TO THE MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION TO DISMISS to November 24, 2025 and December 8, 2025 - filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Loomis, Gaston) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul E. Dwyer - filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Loomis, Gaston) |
| Filing 14 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Paul E. Dwyer. ( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4830638).(Loomis, Gaston) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #15 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul E. Dwyer, filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/5/2025. (kmd)
|
| Filing 13 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #12 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) DEFENDANTS OPENING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 11/17/2025. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Text of Proposed Order, #4 Certification)(Loomis, Gaston) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) - filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Loomis, Gaston) |
| Filing 11 STATEMENT re #7 Notice (Other), #1 Notice of Removal, #9 Notice (Other) Certification of Diversity Jurisdiction by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Compliance)(Loomis, Gaston) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand to State Court - filed by Eurofins Viracor BioPharma Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Compliance Certificate of Compliance, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Spoltore, Leslie) |
| Filing 9 Amended NOTICE of by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Loomis, Gaston) |
| Filing 8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Stipulation and Order Extending The Deadline for Defendant to Answer, Move or Othwerise Respond to the Complaint) - filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Loomis, Gaston) |
| Filing 7 Supplemental NOTICE of by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Loomis, Gaston) |
| Filing 6 STANDING ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING IN ALL CASES (mws) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #8 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (Stipulation and Order Extending The Deadline for Defendant to Answer, Move or Othwerise Respond to the Complaint), filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc. answer due 11/3/2025. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/22/2025. (kmd)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Hamilton Company and Hamilton Bonaduz AG for Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc., filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Loomis, Gaston) Modified on 10/20/2025 (nms). |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: The 7.1 Disclosure Statement filed at D.I. 3 on 10/16/2025, has been removed from the docket. Upon review it was determined that corporate parents/other affiliates were not appropriately cataloged during the transaction. Defendant is to refile the statement and enter its corporate parents Hamilton Company and Hamilton Bonaduz AG when prompted. (nms) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT Pursuant to Local Rule 81.2, by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Loomis, Gaston) |
| DEFICIENCY NOTICE issued by the Court to Plaintiff and Defendant: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 (b)(1), A party must: (1) file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Counsel is requested to supplement the docket with an appropriate Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (scs) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (scs) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL and copies of documents from Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, Case Number 2025-1059-NAC (Filing fee $405, receipt number ADEDC-4813830)- filed by Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Certificate of Service, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (scs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Eurofins Viracor BioPharma Services, LLC v. Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eurofins Viracor BioPharma Services, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Leslie B. Spoltore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Hamilton Storage Technologies, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gaston P. Loomis, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
