e-Beacon LLC v. Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc.
| e-Beacon LLC |
| Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc. |
| 1:2025cv01357 |
| November 6, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SO ORDERED, re #18 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Respond to Amended Complaint to May 18, 2026 filed by e-Beacon LLC, Reset Briefing Schedule: re #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Answering Brief due 5/18/2026.) Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 4/28/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Respond to Amended Complaint to May 18, 2026 - filed by e-Beacon LLC. (Lutness, Brian) |
| Filing 17 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 5/4/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(Stuhlman, Gregory) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stuhlman, Gregory) |
| Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc.- filed by e-Beacon LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Lutness, Brian) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #14 Proposed STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME March 16, 2026 to April 6, 2026 filed by e-Beacon LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 3/10/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 14 Proposed STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME March 16, 2026 to April 6, 2026 - filed by e-Beacon LLC. (Lutness, Brian) |
| Filing 13 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc.. (Stuhlman, Gregory) |
| Filing 12 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/16/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C)(Stuhlman, Gregory) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Stuhlman, Gregory) |
|
Filing 10
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Limited Admission MOTION AND ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE filed by e-Beacon LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 2/11/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 9 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Isaac Philip Rabicoff. ( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4896971).(Lutness, Brian) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Limited Admission MOTION AND ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE - filed by e-Beacon LLC. (Lutness, Brian) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by e-Beacon LLC, Set Answer Deadlines: Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc. answer due 3/2/2026. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 1/13/2026. (jaa)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer - filed by e-Beacon LLC. (Lutness, Brian) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT filed by e-Beacon LLC, Reset Briefing Schedule: re #6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT. (Answering Brief due 1/16/2026.) Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 12/3/2025. (lnb)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT - filed by e-Beacon LLC. (Lutness, Brian) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:25-cv-01357-UNA, 1:25-cv-01358-UNA (alb) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc. on 11/7/2025. (oam) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by e-Beacon LLC. (oam) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,515,386. (oam) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (oam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4831720) - filed by e-Beacon LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Notice of Related Cases, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(oam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: e-Beacon LLC v. Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: e-Beacon LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brian E. Lutness |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Greenlight Financial Technology, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Gregory Erich Stuhlman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
