Yanovitch v. Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc.
| Amanda Yanovitch |
| Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. |
| 1:2025cv01474 |
| December 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORAL ORDER: Having reviewed the parties' joint status report (D.I. 7), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before June 11, 2026, the parties shall either file (1) a stipulation and [proposed] order of dismissal, or (2) a joint status report providing the Court with a status of finalizing the settlement documents and the date the parties anticipate filing the stipulation and [proposed] order of dismissal. ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 5/11/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 7 Joint STATUS REPORT by Amanda Yanovitch. (deLeeuw, Peter) |
|
Filing 6
ORAL ORDER: Having reviewed the parties' joint status report (D.I. 5), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before May 8, 2026, the parties shall either file (1) a stipulation and [proposed] order of dismissal, or (2) a joint status report providing the Court with a status of finalizing the settlement documents and the date the parties anticipate filing the stipulation and [proposed] order of dismissal. ORDERED by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 4/9/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 5 Joint STATUS REPORT by Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc.. (Stover, Chad) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #4 STIPULATION to Stay Proceedings Pending Mediation filed by Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc., Case stayed. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 3/9/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION to Stay Proceedings Pending Mediation - filed by Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc.. (Stover, Chad) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Amanda Yanovitch: For Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. waiver sent on 1/30/2026, answer due 3/31/2026. (deLeeuw, Peter) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mrr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4852974) - filed by Amanda Yanovitch. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mrr) |
| No Summons Issued. (mrr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Yanovitch v. Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amanda Yanovitch | |
| Represented By: | Peter Bradford deLeeuw |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Electrolux Consumer Products, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Chad S.C. Stover |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
