Wonderland Switzerland AG v. Evenflo Company, Inc.
| Wonderland Switzerland AG |
| Evenflo Company, Inc. |
| 1:2025cv01521 |
| December 17, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Aaron E. Hankel for Evenflo Company, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
| Filing 15 REPLY BRIEF re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon res judicata filed by Evenflo Company, Inc.. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Lauren E. Douville for Evenflo Company, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
SO ORDERED, re #13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Lauren Douville and Aaron E. Hankel filed by Evenflo Company, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 4/21/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 14 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Lauren Douville and Aaron E. Hankel. ( re #13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Lauren Douville and Aaron E. Hankel )( Payment of $ 100, receipt number ADEDC-4952236).(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Lauren Douville and Aaron E. Hankel - filed by Evenflo Company, Inc.. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to File Reply Brief to Motion to Dismiss to April 27, 2026 filed by Evenflo Company, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 4/8/2026. (jaa)
|
| Filing 12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant to File Reply Brief to Motion to Dismiss to April 27, 2026 - filed by Evenflo Company, Inc.. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 11 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon res judicata filed by Wonderland Switzerland AG.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 4/13/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Keller, Karen) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Wonderland Switzerland AG to File its Answering Brief in Opposition to Evenflo Company, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss to April 6, 2026 filed by Wonderland Switzerland AG,Reset Briefing Schedule: re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon res judicata. Answering Brief due 4/6/2026. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 3/23/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Wonderland Switzerland AG to File its Answering Brief in Opposition to Evenflo Company, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss to April 6, 2026 - filed by Wonderland Switzerland AG. (Lynch, Virginia) |
| Filing 9 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon res judicata filed by Evenflo Company, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/23/2026. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-16)(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon res judicata - filed by Evenflo Company, Inc.. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Wonderland Switzerland AG: For Evenflo Company, Inc. waiver sent on 1/8/2026, answer due 3/9/2026. (Lynch, Virginia) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wonderland Switzerland AG.Evenflo Company, Inc. served on 12/18/2025, answer due 1/8/2026. (Keller, Karen) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Evenflo Company, Inc. on 12/17/2025. (mpb) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Wonderland International AG for Wonderland Switzerland AG filed by Wonderland Switzerland AG. (mpb) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 7,862,117; 8,087,725; 8,123,294. (mpb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement Damages with Jury Demand against Evenflo Company, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4860876) - filed by Wonderland Switzerland AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wonderland Switzerland AG v. Evenflo Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wonderland Switzerland AG | |
| Represented By: | Virginia Lynch |
| Represented By: | Karen Elizabeth Keller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Evenflo Company, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lauren E. Douville |
| Represented By: | Jeremy A. Tigan |
| Represented By: | Aaron E. Hankel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
