Primos Storage Technology LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
| Primos Storage Technology LLC |
| Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Web Services, Inc. |
| 1:2025cv01571 |
| December 30, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| John Campbell Barker |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 40 NOTICE of Compliance re Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Primos First Amended Complaint has been fully briefed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. re #38 Answering Brief in Opposition, #26 Opening Brief in Support, #25 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , #39 Reply Brief (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 39 REPLY BRIEF re #25 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 38 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #25 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Primos Storage Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 5/11/2026. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 37 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Web Services, Inc.s Reply Brief in Support of their Motion to Dismiss Primos First Amended Complaint by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. (Farnan, Kelly) |
Filing 36
ORAL ORDER: The parties' #35 stipulation to extend briefing deadlines is granted. Defendants shall file their reply brief in support of their motion to dismiss by May 1, 2026. Ordered by Judge John Campbell Barker on 4/22/2026. (lah)
|
| Filing 35 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Web Services, Inc. to file their Reply Brief in support of their Motion to Dismiss to May 1, 2026 - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 34 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Primos Storage Technology LLC's Opposition to Amazon's Partial Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint by Primos Storage Technology LLC (Farnan, Michael) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Christine E. Lehman for Primos Storage Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
Filing 33
ORAL ORDER: Plaintiffs #28 Motion for Pro Hac Vice appearance of attorney Christine E. Lehman is granted. Signed by Judge John Campbell Barker on 04/06/2026. (mrr)
|
Filing 32
ORAL ORDER: The parties #31 Joint Stipulation to Extend the Deadline for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss is granted. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants Motion by April 17, 2026. Signed by Judge John Campbell Barker on 04/06/2026. (mrr) (mrr)
|
| Filing 31 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss to 4/17/2026 - filed by Primos Storage Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 30 NOTICE of Readiness for Scheduling Conference by Primos Storage Technology LLC (Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 29 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Christine E. Lehman. ( re #28 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christine E. Lehman )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4935969).(Farnan, Michael) |
| Filing 28 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christine E. Lehman - filed by Primos Storage Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael) |
Filing 27
STANDING ORDER Regulating Practice in Delaware Cases. Signed by Judge John Campbell Barker on 03/30/2026. (jfm)
|
| Filing 26 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #25 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 4/10/2026. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Kelly) |
Filing 24
ORAL ORDER: The parties' #23 stipulation to extend time for defendants to move, answer, or otherwise respond to plaintiff's first amended complaint (Doc. #22 ) is granted. Defendants' new deadline is March 27, 2026. Ordered by District Judge J. Campbell Barker on 3/24/2026. (lah)
|
| Filing 23 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Web Services, Inc. to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint (D.I. 22) to through and including March 27, 2026 - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge John Campbell Barker. Please include the initials of the Judge (JCB) after the case number on all documents filed. (rlr) |
| Filing 22 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.- filed by Primos Storage Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-25, #2 Exhibits 26-51, #3 Exhibits 52-76)(Farnan, Michael) |
| Remark: The motion to dismiss at D.I. #15 is terminated as moot per the filing of the First Amended Complaint. (mws) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Chandler Matz & Thomas B. King for Amazon Web Services, Inc. & Amazon.com, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
| Filing 21 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Thomas B. King and Chandler Matz. ( re #20 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas B. King and Chandler Matz )( Payment of $ 100, receipt number ADEDC-4915502).(Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 20 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas B. King and Chandler Matz - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly) |
SO ORDERED, re #20 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas B. King and Chandler Matz, filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/5/2026. (kmd)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Christina V. Rayburn for Amazon Web Services, Inc. & Amazon.com, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
| Filing 19 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Christina Rayburn. ( re #18 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christina Rayburn )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4913021).(Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christina Rayburn - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly) |
SO ORDERED, re #18 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christina Rayburn filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/3/2026. (mws)
|
| Filing 17 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Other Affiliate AWSHC, Inc. for Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 16 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/16/2026. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Compliance, #2 Appendix A, #3 Appendix B)(Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL re Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.: Entry of appearance of attorney Kelly E. Farnan. Attorney John G. Day, Andrew C. Mayo, and the law firm of Ashby & Geddes terminated. (Farnan, Kelly) |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME by which Defendants must answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 2, 2026 - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.. (Mayo, Andrew) |
SO ORDERED, re #13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME by which Defendants must answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to March 2, 2026, filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. Reset Answer Deadlines: Amazon Web Services, Inc. answer due 3/2/2026; Amazon.com, Inc. answer due 3/2/2026. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/17/2026. (kmd)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Change of Address by Brian E. Farnan (Farnan, Brian) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Sean McCarthy for Primos Storage Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (jmn) |
SO ORDERED, re #11 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to February 23, 2026, filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. Reset Answer Deadlines: Amazon Web Services, Inc. answer due 2/23/2026; Amazon.com, Inc. answer due 2/23/2026. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/13/2026. (kmd)
|
| Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to February 23, 2026 - filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc.. (Mayo, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 Supplemental Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Primos Storage Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jeremiah Collins & Jaime F Cardenas-Navia for Primos Storage Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
| Filing 9 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Jaime F. Cardenas-Navia, Sean McCarthy, and Jeremiah Collins. ( re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jaime F. Cardenas-Navia, Sean McCarthy, and Jeremiah Collins )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4872072).(Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jaime F. Cardenas-Navia, Sean McCarthy, and Jeremiah Collins - filed by Primos Storage Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 7 STANDING ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING IN ALL CASES (mws) |
SO ORDERED, re #8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jaime F. Cardenas-Navia, Sean McCarthy, and Jeremiah Collins, filed by Primos Storage Technology LLC. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/7/2026. (kmd)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Primos Storage Technology LLC.Amazon Web Services, Inc. served on 1/2/2026, answer due 1/23/2026; Amazon.com, Inc. served on 1/2/2026, answer due 1/23/2026. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Amazon Web Services, Inc. on 12/30/2025; Amazon.com, Inc. on 12/30/2025. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, Amazon.com, Inc.)(jfm) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed - filed by Primos Storage Technology LLC. (jfm) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 7,386,663 B2; US 7,937,528 B2; US 10,599,344 B1; US 8,078,944 B2 ; US 8,312,356 B1. (jfm) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (jfm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4867038) - filed by Primos Storage Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-25, #2 Exhibits 26-51, #3 Exhibits 52-76, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(jfm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.