Health Discovery Corporation v. Nvidia Corporation
| Health Discovery Corporation |
| Nvidia Corporation |
| 1:2025cv01588 |
| December 31, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 DECLARATION of P. Branko Pejic re #16 Answering Brief in Opposition by Health Discovery Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3)(Phillips, John) |
| Filing 16 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Health Discovery Corporation. Reply Brief due date per #13 Stipulation and Order is 7/14/2026. (Phillips, John) Modified on 6/24/2026 (dlw). |
| Filing 15 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for P. Branko Pejic and Jill M. Browning. ( re #14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney P. Branko Pejic and Jill M. Browning )( Payment of $ 100, receipt number ADEDC-4982739).(Bilson, David) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney P. Branko Pejic and Jill M. Browning - filed by Health Discovery Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Certification of P. Branko Pejic, #2 Certification of Jill M. Browning)(Bilson, David) |
SO ORDERED re #14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney P. Branko Pejic and Jill M. Browning filed by Health Discovery Corporation. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/2/2026. (dlw)
|
|
SO ORDERED re #13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff to file its answering brief in opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and for Defendant to file its reply brief in support of the Motion to June 23, 2026 and July 14, 2026 (Set Briefing Schedule: re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Answering Brief due 6/23/2026. Reply Brief due 7/14/2026). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/1/2026. (dlw)
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Plaintiff to file its answering brief in opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and for Defendant to file its reply brief in support of the Motion to June 23, 2026 and July 14, 2026 - filed by Health Discovery Corporation. (Bilson, David) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Sarah E. Piepmeier, Christina J. McCullough, Stevan R. Stark, Bryan S. Banks, Chad S. Campbell, Makenzi Galvan, Tara Kurtis for Nvidia Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (scs) |
|
Filing 12
ORAL ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiff serves its opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at https://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/28/2026. (dlw)
|
|
SO ORDERED re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christina J. McCullough, Stevan R. Stark, Chad S. Campbell, Bryan S. Banks, Makenzi Galvan, Sarah E. Piepmeier, and Tara Kurtis filed by Nvidia Corporation. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/27/2026. (dlw)
|
| Filing 11 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Sarah E. Piepmeier and Tara Kurtis. ( re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christina J. McCullough, Stevan R. Stark, Chad S. Campbell, Bryan S. Banks, Makenzi Galvan, Sarah E. Piepmeier, and Tara Kurtis )( Payment of $ 100, receipt number ADEDC-4977485).(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 10 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Christina J. McCullough, Stevan R. Stark, Chad S. Campbell, Bryan S. Banks, and Makenzi Galvan. ( re #9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christina J. McCullough, Stevan R. Stark, Chad S. Campbell, Bryan S. Banks, Makenzi Galvan, Sarah E. Piepmeier, and Tara Kurtis )( Payment of $ 250, receipt number ADEDC-4977476).(Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christina J. McCullough, Stevan R. Stark, Chad S. Campbell, Bryan S. Banks, Makenzi Galvan, Sarah E. Piepmeier, and Tara Kurtis - filed by Nvidia Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF in Support re #7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Nvidia Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 6/9/2026. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Nvidia Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Health Discovery Corporation : For Nvidia Corporation waiver sent on 3/27/2026, answer due 5/26/2026. (Phillips, John) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Nvidia Corporation on 1/2/2026. (mrr) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Health Discovery Corporation. (mrr) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,402,685. (mrr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mrr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Nvidia Corporation (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4868137) - filed by Health Discovery Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F (part 1), #7 Exhibit F (part 2), #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Civil Cover Sheet)(mrr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
