Navog LLC v. Powerfleet, Inc.
| Navog LLC |
| Powerfleet, Inc. |
| 1:2026cv00032 |
| January 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks.(lnb) |
Filing 12
ORDER re #11 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Navog LLC, ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 3/30/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Navog LLC as to PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Lutness, Brian) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Navog LLC, Reset Answer Deadlines: All Defendants. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 2/13/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint - filed by Navog LLC. (Lutness, Brian) |
|
Filing 9
SO ORDERED, re #7 MOTION for Limited Admission MOTION AND ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE filed by Navog LLC. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 2/11/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 8 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Isaac Philip Rabicoff. ( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4897022).(Lutness, Brian) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Limited Admission MOTION AND ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE - filed by Navog LLC. (Lutness, Brian) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Navog LLC.Powerfleet, Inc. served on 1/22/2026, answer due 2/12/2026. (Lutness, Brian) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:26-cv-00032-UNA, 1:26-cv-00033-UNA (alb) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to PowerFleet, Inc. on 1/12/2026. (mrr) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Navog LLC. (mrr) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 10,593,205. (mrr) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mrr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Powerfleet, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4874913) - filed by Navog LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(mrr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Navog LLC v. Powerfleet, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Navog LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brian E. Lutness |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Powerfleet, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
