General Motors LLC et al v. Mitchell International, Inc.
| General Motors LLC and General Motors Global Technology Operations LLC |
| Mitchell International, Inc. |
| 1:2026cv00129 |
| February 3, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| John Campbell Barker |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 1 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
STANDING ORDER Regulating Practice in Delaware Cases. Signed by Judge John Campbell Barker on 03/30/2026. (jfm)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Unopposed Motion to Stay. Within seven days of the final determination in Certain Vehicle Parts and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1491, the parties shall file a notice with the court to reopen this case. The court orders the clerk of court to administratively close this case. All pending motions are held in abeyance. (CASE CLOSED). Signed by Judge John Campbell Barker on 3/26/2026. (lah)
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1659 Pending Parallel ITC Action - filed by Mitchell International, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit 1)(O'Byrne, Stephanie) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge John Campbell Barker. Please include the initials of the Judge (JCB) after the case number on all documents filed. (rlr) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #10 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 1, 2026. (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Mitchell International, Inc. answer due 5/1/2026). Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 2/27/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 11 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent MIH Parent, Inc. for Mitchell International, Inc. filed by Mitchell International, Inc.. (O'Byrne, Stephanie) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 05/01/2026 - filed by Mitchell International, Inc.. (O'Byrne, Stephanie) |
| Filing 9 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Joseph A. Herriges. ( re #7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph A. Herriges )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4899359).(Gupta Fiorella, Nitika) |
| DEFICIENCY NOTICE by the Court issued to Plaintiffs re #7 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Per the December 21, 2023 Standing Order, the fee of $50.00 shall be paid upon the filing of a motion. For Pro Hac Vice payments via CM/ECF, local counsel can pay by credit card using the appropriate event code from the Pro Hac Vice Fee Menu in the case the motion is being filed in. (ceg) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph A. Herriges filed by General Motors LLC, General Motors Global Technology Operations LLC. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 2/12/2026. (ceg)
|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Joseph A. Herriges for General Motors Global Technology Operations LLC & General Motors LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by General Motors LLC, General Motors Global Technology Operations LLC.Mitchell International, Inc. served on 2/9/2026, answer due 3/2/2026. (Gupta Fiorella, Nitika) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph A. Herriges - filed by General Motors Global Technology Operations LLC, General Motors LLC. (Gupta Fiorella, Nitika) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 6 Alias Summons issued as to Mitchell International, Inc.. (scs) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Mitchell International, Inc. on 2/4/2026. (mpb) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent General Motors Company for General Motors Global Technology Operations LLC and General Motors LLC - filed by General Motors Global Technology Operations LLC, General Motors LLC. (mpb) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US D749,997 S; US D792,815 S; US D792,816 S; US D793,301 S; US D828,247 S; US D828,248 S; US D828,256 S; US D847,703 S; US D848,318 S; US D856,874 S; US D818,406 S; US D826,114 S; US D843,025 S; US D883,155 S; US D902,807 S; US D930,533 S; US D859,239 S; US D848,647 S; US D826,803 S. (mpb) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Mitchell International, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4892115) - filed by General Motors LLC, General Motors Global Technology Operations LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
