Cloud Tank, Inc. v. Intel Corporation
| Cloud Tank, Inc. |
| Intel Corporation |
| 1:2026cv00136 |
| February 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Jennifer L Hall |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 56 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Andrew M. Moshos by Intel Corporation (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 55 REDACTED VERSION of #53 Reply Brief by Intel Corporation. (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 54 REQUEST for Oral Argument by Intel Corporation re #40 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 53 [SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #40 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Intel Corporation. (Rovner, Philip) |
Filing 52
ORDER granting #51 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Under Seal Defendant Intel Corporation's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 5/13/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 51 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Under Seal Defendant Intel Corporation's Reply in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint - filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 LR 7.1.1 Certification)(Rovner, Philip) Modified on 5/12/2026 (ceg). |
| Filing 50 REDACTED VERSION of #49 Answering Brief in Opposition, re #40 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 49 [SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #40 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Cloud Tank, Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 5/4/2026. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 48 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Cloud Tank to file its Opposition to Defendants Moton to Dismiss & Intel to file its Reply to April 27, 2026 and May 14, 2026, respectively - filed by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Kraftschik, Stephen) |
SO ORDERED, re #48 Stipulation and Order to Extend Briefing Deadlines. (*Reset Briefing Schedule re #40 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim: Answering Brief due 4/27/2026; Reply Brief due 5/14/2026). Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 4/10/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 47 REDACTED VERSION of #42 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-I)(Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 46 REDACTED VERSION of #41 Opening Brief in Support by Intel Corporation. (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 45 DECLARATION of Trevor Jones re #40 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rovner, Philip) |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: The declaration filed at D.I. 45 has been removed per the filer's request. (ceg) |
SO ORDERED, re #44 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to file public-redacted versions of D.I. #41 and D.I. #42 to April 9, 2026. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 4/7/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 44 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file public-redacted versions of D.I. 41 and D.I. 42 to April 9, 2026 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Moshos, Andrew) |
Filing 43
ORDER granting #39 Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Defendant's Opening Brief, Declarations, and Exhibits Under Seal. Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 3/31/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 42 [SEALED] DECLARATION of Philip A. Rovner re #40 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-I)(Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 41 [SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #40 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 4/13/2026. (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 40 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 39 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Defendant's Opening Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint, the Declaration of Philip Rovner in Support of the Motion to Dismiss, the Declaration of Trevor Jones in Support of the Motion to Dismiss, and attached Exhibits Under Seal - filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Rule 7.1.1 Certification)(Rovner, Philip) |
Filing 38
ORAL ORDER: Intel's motion for teleconference to resolve dispute (D.I. #24 ) was resolved as stated from the bench at the March 19, 2026 hearing. The parties should consult the transcript for details. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 3/19/2026. (twk)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jennifer L. Hall - Discovery Dispute Teleconference held on 3/19/2026. (Court Reporter: H. Triozzi). (twk) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Kevin Davis for Cloud Tank, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jonathan R. Spivey for Cloud Tank, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Shaleen J. Patel for Cloud Tank, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Aaron M. Levine for Cloud Tank, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
| Filing 37 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Kevin Davis. ( re #36 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kevin Davis )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4924844).(Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 36 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kevin Davis - filed by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Kraftschik, Stephen) |
SO ORDERED, re #36 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kevin Davis filed by Cloud Tank, Inc. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 3/17/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 35 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Melvin A. Matt Todd. ( re #34 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Melvin A. Matt Todd )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4923656).(Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 34 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Melvin A. Matt Todd - filed by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 33 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Shaleen J. Patel. ( re #32 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Shaleen J. Patel )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4923604).(Kraftschik, Stephen) |
SO ORDERED, re #28 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Aaron Levine, #30 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jonathan Spivey filed by Cloud Tank, Inc. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 3/16/2026. (ceg)
|
| DEFICIENCY NOTICE by the Court issued to Plaintiff re #32 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Shaleen J. Patel. Per the December 21, 2023 Standing Order, the fee of $50.00 shall be paid upon the filing of a motion. For Pro Hac Vice payments via CM/ECF, local counsel can pay by credit card using the appropriate event code from the Pro Hac Vice Fee Menu in the case the motion is being filed in. (ceg) |
SO ORDERED, re #32 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Shaleen J. Patel filed by Cloud Tank, Inc. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 3/16/2026. (ceg)
|
SO ORDERED, re #34 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Melvin A. Matt Todd filed by Cloud Tank, Inc. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 3/16/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 32 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Shaleen J. Patel - filed by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 31 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Jonathan Spivey. ( re #30 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jonathan Spivey )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4922597).(Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 30 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jonathan Spivey - filed by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 29 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Aaron Levine. ( re #28 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Aaron Levine )( Payment of $ 50, receipt number ADEDC-4922590).(Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 28 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Aaron Levine - filed by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 27 Letter to The Honorable Jennifer L. Hall from Stephen J. Kraftschik regarding Response to Defendant's March 10, 2026 Letter - re #26 Letter. (Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 26 Letter to The Honorable Jennifer L. Hall from Philip A. Rovner regarding Return of Intel's Laptop. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rovner, Philip) |
Filing 25
ORAL ORDER Setting Teleconference: The Court has reviewed the Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute (D.I. #24 ). A discovery dispute teleconference is scheduled for March 19, 2026 at 10:00 AM Eastern Time before Judge Jennifer L. Hall. By no later than March 10, 2026, the party(ies) seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. By no later than March 12, 2026, any party(ies) opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining that party's reasons for its opposition. Counsel is reminded to provide courtesy copies. Counsel shall send dial-in information directly to the Court, no later than 24 hours prior to the hearing, using the following e-mail address: [email protected]. The Court may choose to resolve the dispute prior to the telephone conference and will, in that event, cancel the conference. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 3/6/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 24 MOTION for Teleconference to Resolve Dispute - filed by Intel Corporation. (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 23 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to March 30, 2026 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 22 REDACTED VERSION of #15 Amended Complaint Exhibit 4 - Red-line by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Kraftschik, Stephen) |
SO ORDERED, re #23 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint to March 30, 2026. (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Intel Corporation answer due 3/30/2026). Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 2/27/2026. (ceg)
|
Filing 21
ORDER granting #18 Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and Exhibits A through C Under Seal. Plaintiff shall file a public redacted version of its First Amended Complaint and exhibits thereto within 7 days of this Order. Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 2/26/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Cloud Tank, Inc..Intel Corporation served on 2/25/2026, answer due 3/18/2026. (Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 19 REDACTED VERSION of #15 Amended Complaint, by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #5 Certificate of Service)(Kraftschik, Stephen) Modified docket text on 2/25/2026 (ceg). |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint and Exhibits A through C under seal - filed by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Compliance, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Filing 17 Summons Issued as to Intel Corporation on 2/25/2026. (jfm) |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: Attachment 4 to the redacted version found at D.I. #19 has been removed per the request of the filer. (ceg) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Carolyn H. Luedtke, Achyut J. Phadke, Aditi N Ghatlia for Intel Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (lah) |
Filing 16
ORAL ORDER: Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint under seal (D.I. #15 ) without first obtaining leave from this Court. "The authority for filing a document under seal must be provided by a protective order or other order of the Court" (Electronic Filing of Sealed Civil Documents (Rev 3/29/17)). Plaintiff is to file a Motion for Leave to File Under Seal by February 25, 2026. Failure to timely file this motion may result in the document being unsealed. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 2/20/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 15 [SEALED] First AMENDED COMPLAINT against Intel Corporation- filed by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Red-line, #5 Certificate of Service)(Kraftschik, Stephen) |
SO ORDERED, re #13 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Carolyn Luedtke, Achyut Phadke, and Aditi Ghatlia filed by Intel Corporation. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 2/17/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 14 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Carolyn Luedtke, Achyut Phadke, and Aditi Ghatlia. ( re #13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Carolyn Luedtke, Achyut Phadke, and Aditi Ghatlia )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4900969).(Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Carolyn Luedtke, Achyut Phadke, and Aditi Ghatlia - filed by Intel Corporation. (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 12 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Intel Corporation. (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 11 Letter to The Honorable Jennifer L. Hall from Philip A. Rovner regarding response to the public version of the Complaint - re #6 Redacted Document. (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Philip A. Rovner on behalf of Intel Corporation (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew E. Fischer on behalf of Intel Corporation (Fischer, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jacqueline Ann Rogers on behalf of Intel Corporation (Rogers, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Mark Moshos on behalf of Intel Corporation (Moshos, Andrew) |
| DEFICIENCY NOTICE issued by the Court to Defendant: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 (b)(1), A party must: (1) file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Counsel is requested to supplement the docket with an appropriate Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (ceg) |
| Filing 6 REDACTED VERSION of #2 Complaint by Cloud Tank, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kraftschik, Stephen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #1 MOTION for Leave to File Complaint and Exhibits Under Seal - filed by Cloud Tank, Inc. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/5/2026. (mws)
|
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Cloud Tank, Inc. (mpb) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
| Filing 2 [SEALED] COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Intel Corporation (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4893656) - filed by Cloud Tank, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to File Complaint and Exhibits Under Seal - filed by Cloud Tank, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(mpb) |
| No Summons Issued. (mpb) |
| Remark: Exit electronic copies to Duty Judge (CFC). (mpb) |
| Remark: Case submitted for routine judicial assignment. (mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.