BioNTech SE v. ModernaTX, Inc. et al
| BioNTech SE |
| ModernaTX, Inc., Moderna, Inc. and Moderna US, Inc. |
| 1:2026cv00183 |
| February 19, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Gregory B Williams |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 1 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Ernest Yakob, Arlene L. Chow & Jennifer Esch for BioNTech SE added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: Pro Hac Entry removed; filed in error. (oam) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Ramya Sri Vallabhaneni for BioNTech SE added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (slk) |
SO ORDERED, re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Arlene Chow, Ernest Yakob, Ramya Vallabhaneni, and Jennifer Judson Esch filed by BioNTech SE. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 3/12/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 11 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Arlene Chow, Ernest Yakob, Ramya Vallabhaneni, and Jennifer Judson Esch. ( re #10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Arlene Chow, Ernest Yakob, Ramya Vallabhaneni, and Jennifer Judson Esch )( Payment of $ 200, receipt number ADEDC-4920692).(Joyce, Alexandra) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Arlene Chow, Ernest Yakob, Ramya Vallabhaneni, and Jennifer Judson Esch - filed by BioNTech SE. (Joyce, Alexandra) |
|
SO ORDERED, re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 6/10/2026 filed by Moderna, Inc., Moderna US, Inc., ModernaTX, Inc. Reset Answer Deadlines: All Defendants. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 2/27/2026. (lnb)
|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to 6/10/2026 - filed by Moderna US, Inc., Moderna, Inc., ModernaTX, Inc.. (Farnan, Michael) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BioNTech SE.ModernaTX, Inc. served on 2/19/2026, answer due 3/12/2026. (Joyce, Alexandra) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BioNTech SE.Moderna US, Inc. served on 2/19/2026, answer due 3/12/2026. (Joyce, Alexandra) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by BioNTech SE.Moderna, Inc. served on 2/19/2026, answer due 3/12/2026. (Joyce, Alexandra) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Moderna US, Inc. on 2/19/2026; Moderna, Inc. on 2/19/2026; ModernaTX, Inc. on 2/19/2026. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued Moderna US Inc., #2 Summons Issued ModernaTX Inc.)(slk) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by BioNTech SE. (slk) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 12,133,899. (slk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (slk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Moderna US, Inc., Moderna, Inc., ModernaTX, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4903912) - filed by BioNTech SE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-13, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(slk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
