Pfizer Inc. et al v. Micro Labs Limited et al
| Pfizer Inc. and PF PRISM IMB B.V. |
| Micro Labs Limited and Micro Labs USA, Inc. |
| Micro Labs USA, Inc. and Micro Labs Limited |
| PF PRISM IMB B.V. and Pfizer Inc. |
| 1:2026cv00439 |
| April 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Jennifer L Hall |
| Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 ANSWER to #9 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim, by PF PRISM IMB B.V., Pfizer Inc.(Dellinger, Megan) Modified on 6/1/2026 (ceg). |
Filing 15
SO ORDERED, re #14 Joint Motion and Order for Extension of Time to submit a proposed Scheduling Order and accompanying letter to a date not earlier than July 24, 2026. Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 5/26/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 14 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to submit a proposed Scheduling Order and accompanying letter to a date not earlier than July 24, 2026 - filed by PF PRISM IMB B.V., Pfizer Inc.. (Dellinger, Megan) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Rachel L. Schweers for Micro Labs Limited, Micro Labs USA, Inc., and Micro Labs USA, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Lance A. Soderstrom for Micro Labs Limited, Micro Labs USA, Inc., and Micro Labs USA, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
| Pro Hac Vice Attorney Deepro R. Mukerjee for Micro Labs Limited, Micro Labs USA, Inc., and Micro Labs USA, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (oam) |
|
Filing 13
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days, the parties shall jointly prepare and file the following: (i) a proposed Scheduling Order consistent with Judge Hall's "Rule 16 Scheduling Order - Patent", and (ii) a letter, not to exceed three pages, setting forth (a) a description of what this case is about; (b) the parties' positions regarding any disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order; and (c) a list of any other issues the parties want to address at the Rule 16 Scheduling Conference. Thereafter, the Court may schedule a Rule 16 Scheduling Conference to be held with Judge Hall. The Scheduling Order can be found on Judge Hall's portion of the District Court's website. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 5/12/2026. (ceg)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #11 Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Deepro R. Mukerjee, Rachel L. Schweers and Lance A. Soderstrom filed by Micro Labs USA, Inc., Micro Labs Limited. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 5/12/2026. (ceg)
|
| Filing 12 Pro Hac Vice Fee - Credit Card Payment received for Deepro R. Mukerjee, Rachel L. Schweers, and Lance A. Soderstrom. ( re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Deepro R. Mukerjee, Attorney Rachel L. Schweers and Attorney Lance A. Soderstrom )( Payment of $ 150, receipt number ADEDC-4966814).(Hitch, Cortlan) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Deepro R. Mukerjee, Attorney Rachel L. Schweers and Attorney Lance A. Soderstrom - filed by Micro Labs Limited, Micro Labs USA, Inc.. (Hitch, Cortlan) |
| Filing 10 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Micro Labs Ltd. for Micro Labs USA, Inc. filed by Micro Labs Limited, Micro Labs USA, Inc.. (Hitch, Cortlan) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against PF PRISM IMB B.V., Pfizer Inc. by Micro Labs USA, Inc., Micro Labs Limited.(Hitch, Cortlan) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:26-cv-00439-UNA, 1:26-cv-00440-UNA, 1:26-cv-00441-UNA (alb) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint and related papers served on Micro Labs USA, Inc. on April 20, 2026, filed by PF PRISM IMB B.V., Pfizer Inc.. (Dellinger, Megan) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint and related papers served on Micro Labs Limited on April 20, 2026, filed by PF PRISM IMB B.V., Pfizer Inc.. (Dellinger, Megan) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Micro Labs Limited on 4/17/2026; Micro Labs USA, Inc. on 4/17/2026. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued)(lah) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Pfizer Inc. for PF PRISM IMB B.V. - filed by PF PRISM IMB B.V., Pfizer Inc. (lah) |
| Filing 4 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 9,035,074 B2; 9,545,405 B2; 9,549,929 B2. (lah) |
| Filing 3 Supplemental information for patent cases involving an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) - Date Patentee(s) Received Notice: 3/5/2026. Date of Expiration of Patent: See Attached.Thirty Month Stay Deadline: 7/14/2029. (lah) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Micro Labs Limited, Micro Labs USA, Inc. (Filing fee $405, receipt number ADEDC-4949719) - filed by Pfizer Inc., PF PRISM IMB B.V. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(lah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
