VB Assets, LLC v. Google LLC et al
| VB Assets, LLC |
| Google LLC, XXVI Holdings Inc., Alphabet Inc., Android, Inc. and YouTube, LLC |
| 1:2026cv00443 |
| April 17, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Maryellen Noreika |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to through and including July 10, 2026 - filed by Alphabet Inc., Android, Inc., Google LLC, XXVI Holdings Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Farnan, Kelly) |
SO ORDERED re #9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to through and including July 10, 2026 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Alphabet Inc. answer due 7/10/2026; Android, Inc. answer due 7/10/2026; Google LLC answer due 7/10/2026; XXVI Holdings Inc. answer due 7/10/2026; YouTube, LLC answer due 7/10/2026). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/8/2026. (dlw)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Frederick L. Cottrell, III on behalf of Alphabet Inc., Android, Inc., Google LLC, XXVI Holdings Inc., YouTube, LLC (Cottrell, Frederick) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to through and including June 22, 2026 - filed by Alphabet Inc., Android, Inc., Google LLC, XXVI Holdings Inc., YouTube, LLC. (Farnan, Kelly) |
|
SO ORDERED re #7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to through and including June 22, 2026 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Alphabet Inc. answer due 6/22/2026; Android, Inc. answer due 6/22/2026; Google LLC answer due 6/22/2026; XXVI Holdings Inc. answer due 6/22/2026; YouTube, LLC answer due 6/22/2026). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/24/2026. (dlw)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (alb) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by VB Assets, LLC.Alphabet Inc. served on 4/17/2026, answer due 5/8/2026; Android, Inc. served on 4/17/2026, answer due 5/8/2026; Google LLC served on 4/17/2026, answer due 5/8/2026; XXVI Holdings Inc. served on 4/17/2026, answer due 5/8/2026; YouTube, LLC served on 4/17/2026, answer due 5/8/2026. (Farnan, Brian) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Alphabet Inc. on 4/17/2026; Android, Inc. on 4/17/2026; Google LLC on 4/17/2026; XXVI Holdings Inc. on 4/17/2026; YouTube, LLC on 4/17/2026. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 Summons Issued, #3 Summons Issued, #4 Summons Issued)(lah) |
| Filing 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by VB Assets, LLC. (lah) |
| Filing 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,073,681 B2; US 8,515,765 B2; US 10,297,249 B2; US 10,510,341 B1 ; US 10,755,699 B2; US 7,818,176 B2 ; US 8,527,274 B2; US 8,886,536 B2; US 9,269,097 B2; US 12,236,456 B2; US 11,087,385. (lah) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement with Jury Demand against Alphabet Inc., Android, Inc., Google LLC, XXVI Holdings Inc., YouTube, LLC (Filing fee $405, receipt number ADEDC-4950775) - filed by VB Assets, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-V, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (lah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
