Portfolio Holding, Inc. et al v. Neels et al
| Portfolio Holding, Inc. and Andrew Seger |
| Jake Neels and Automotive Dealer Solutions, LLC d/b/a Dynamic Solutions, LLC, an Iowa LLC |
| 1:2026cv00690 |
| June 11, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DEFICIENCY NOTICE issued by the Court to Plaintiff: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 (b)(1), A party must: (1) file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Counsel is requested to supplement the docket with an appropriate Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. (scs) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed - filed by Automotive Dealer Solutions, LLC, Jake Neels. (scs) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (scs) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL and copies of documents from Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, Case Number 2026-0512-EMD (Filing fee $405, receipt number ADEDC-4991020)- filed by Automotive Dealer Solutions, LLC, Jake Neels. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(scs) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
