Encore at Windsor Hills, LLC et al v. Kentmere Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing, Inc. et al
| Encore at Windsor Hills LLC d/b/a Encore at Foulk, Encore at West Meadow LLC d/b/a Encore Parkside and Encore at Wilmington LLC d/b/a Encore at Wilmington |
| Kentmere Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing, Inc., Leslie Johnson, Tirus Macharia and Dillyn Johnson |
| 1:2026cv00748 |
| June 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Encore Point Holdings LLC for Encore at West Meadow, LLC, Encore at Wilmington, LLC, Encore at Windsor Hills, LLC filed by Encore at West Meadow, LLC, Encore at Wilmington, LLC, Encore at Windsor Hills, LLC. (oam) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (oam) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Dillyn Johnson, Leslie Johnson, Kentmere Rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing, Inc., Tirus Macharia (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-4999811) - filed by Encore at Wilmington, LLC, Encore at Windsor Hills, LLC, Encore at West Meadow, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(oam) |
| No Summons Issued. (oam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
