Lim v. Synaptics Incorporated
| Jumi Lim and Ju-mi Lim |
| Synaptics Incorporated |
| 1:2026cv00808 |
| July 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 CLERK'S ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: Plaintiff shall, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, either: (1) submit a long form (AO 239 Form) application to proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs, or (2) pay in full the filing fee. Failure to comply may result in Dismissal of the case (see Order for further details)(***Copy mailed to Pro Se Filer). Signed by Clerk of Court on 7/7/2026. (lah) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Electronically - filed by Jumi Lim. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Service, #3 Envelope)(lah) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lah) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement filed Pro Se with Jury Demand against Synaptics Incorporated (*No IFP; No fee paid) - filed by Jumi Lim. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-J, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope) (lah) |
| Remark: A Magistrate Consent Form, Acknowledgment of Receipt of Magistrate Consent Form, and Pro-Se Privacy Notice have been mailed to the Plaintiff. (lah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
