Liu v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Fengjuan Liu |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Joseph B. Edlow, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin and Benjamin L. Wallace |
| 1:2026cv00840 |
| July 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Naturalization Application |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Todd Blanche on 7/13/2026; Joseph B. Edlow on 7/13/2026; Markwayne Mullin on 7/13/2026; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services on 7/13/2026; Benjamin L. Wallace on 7/13/2026. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 Summons Issued, #3 Summons Issued, #4 Summons Issued)(lah) |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Rule 4. Filed by Fengjuan Liu. (lah) |
| Filing 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Magistrate Consent Forms. Filed by Fengjuan Liu. (lah) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (lah) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus filed Pro Se (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 5786) - filed by Fengjuan Liu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (lah) |
| Remark: A Magistrate Consent Form, Acknowledgment of Receipt of Magistrate Consent Form, and Pro-Se Privacy Notice, and Rule 4 have been provided to the Plaintiff. (lah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
