Rivera v. Lando et al
| Andres Bolin Rivera |
| Zvi Lando, Ronen Faier, Lior Danziger, J.B. Lowe, Betsy Atkins, Marcel Gani, Dana Gross, Dirk Hoke, Avery More, Tal Payne, Nadav Zafrir and SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2026cv00930 |
| July 29, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 [SEALED] DECLARATION of Justin S. Nematzadeh in Support of D.I. #1 MOTION for Leave to File Complaint and Declaration in Support of this Motion Under Seal - filed by Andres Bolin Rivera. (mpb) |
| Filing 3 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mpb) |
| Filing 2 [SEALED] VERIFIED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT filed with Jury Demand against Betsy Atkins, Lior Danziger, Ronen Faier, Marcel Gani, Dana Gross, Dirk Hoke, Zvi Lando, J.B. Lowe, Avery More, Tal Payne, Nadav Zafrir (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-5029009.) - filed by Andres Bolin Rivera. (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(mpb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to File Complaint and Declaration in Support of this Motion Under Seal - filed by Andres Bolin Rivera. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(mpb) |
| No Summons Issued. (mpb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
