Kandel v. Edlow et al
| Aashish Kandel |
| Joseph B. Edlow, Markwayne Mullin, Todd Blanche and Field Office Director USCIS NJ Central Field Office |
| 1:2026cv01058 |
| August 20, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Rule 4 Packet. Acknowledgment filed by Aashish Kandel. (slk) |
| Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Magistrate Consent Forms (D.I. #2 ). Acknowledgment filed by Aashish Kandel. (slk) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Todd Blanche on 8/20/2026; Joseph B. Edlow on 8/20/2026; Field Office Director USCIS NJ Central Field Office on 8/20/2026; Markwayne Mullin on 8/20/2026; Civil Process Clerk on 8/20/2026. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued, #2 Summons Issued, #3 Summons Issued, #4 Summons Issued)(slk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (slk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed Pro Se against Todd Blanche, Joseph B. Edlow, Field Office Director USCIS NJ Central Field Office, and Markwayne Mullin (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number 5903) - filed by Aashish Kandel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibits A-D, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(slk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
