Sciteck Diagnostics, Inc. v. Seroclinix Corporation et al
| Sciteck Diagnostics, Inc. |
| Seroclinix Corporation and Doc Lab, Inc. |
| 1:2026cv01293 |
| October 7, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sciteck Diagnostics, Inc..Doc Lab, Inc. served on 10/8/2026, answer due 10/29/2026; Seroclinix Corporation served on 10/8/2026, answer due 10/29/2026. (Coen, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 Summonses Issued as to Seroclinix Corporation and Doc Lab, Inc. on 10/8/2026. (aas) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/8/2026: #1 Summons Issued) (aas). |
| CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. #4 was modified to add the summons issued to Seroclinix Corporation that was inadvertently excluded. The NEF for D.I. #4 has been regenerated. (aas) |
| Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Sciteck, Inc. for Sciteck Diagnostics, Inc., filed by Sciteck Diagnostics, Inc.. (aas) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (aas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Doc Lab, Inc., Seroclinix Corporation (Filing fee $ 405, receipt number ADEDC-5084556) - filed by Sciteck Diagnostics, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
