Trice v. Hudson et al
| Michael R. Trice |
| Troy Bowden, Kitty Dickinson, Luke Justice and Officer Mark Hudson |
| 1:2026cv01436 |
| November 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CLERK'S ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall either submit the AO 240 Form and trust fund account statement or pay the full filing fee. Notwithstanding, filings already received will be docketed but no action will be taken by the Court until the deficiencies are corrected. Failure to comply may result in Dismissal of the case (see Order for further details)(***Copy mailed to Pro Se Filer). Signed by Clerk of Court on 11/9/2026. (slk) |
| Remark: A Magistrate Consent Form, Acknowledgment of Receipt of Magistrate Consent Form, and Pro-Se Privacy Notice have been mailed to the Plaintiff. (slk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (slk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed pursuant to 42:1983 against Troy Bowden, Kitty Dickinson, Mark Hudson, Luke Justice (No Civil Cover Sheet, Fee Not Paid, No IFP)- filed by Michael R. Trice. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(slk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
