Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Ring Protection LLC
| Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| Ring Protection LLC |
| 1:2026mc00201 |
| April 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Jennifer L Hall |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Motion to Compel |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
SO ORDERED, re (7 in 1:26-mc-00200-JLH, 7 in 1:26-mc-00196-JLH, 7 in 1:26-mc-00201-JLH, 7 in 1:26-mc-00202-JLH) Stipulation and Order to Extend Time for Respondents to file Answering Brief in Opposition to Movant Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to June 19, 2026. (*Reset Briefing Schedule re MOTION to Compel: Answering Brief due 6/19/2026). Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 5/12/2026. Associated Cases: 1:26-mc-00196-JLH, 1:26-mc-00200-JLH, 1:26-mc-00201-JLH, 1:26-mc-00202-JLH(ceg)
|
| Filing 8 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Ring Protection LLC. (Rovner, Philip) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Respondents to file answering briefs in opposition to Movant Cisco Systems, Inc.s Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to June 19, 2026 - filed by Ring Protection LLC, Correct Transmission LLC, LitFin US 2024 LLC, Smart Path Connections LLC. (Rovner, Philip) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:26-mc-00196-UNA, 1:26-mc-00200-UNA, 1:26-mc-00201-UNA, 1:26-mc-00202-UNA (alb) |
| Filing 6 Return of Service Executed by Cisco Systems, Inc.. (Metzler, Sara) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Cisco Systems, Inc. (slk) |
| Filing 4 DECLARATION of Eric Speckhard in support of #1 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to Ring Protection LLC, by Cisco Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-26)(slk) |
| Filing 3 OPENING BRIEF in Support of #1 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to Ring Protection LLC, filed by Cisco Systems, Inc. (slk) |
| Filing 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (slk) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Compel Compliance with Subpoena to Ring Protection LLC (Filing Fee $52, Receipt No. ADEDC-4956172) - filed by Cisco Systems, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(slk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Ring Protection LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Cisco Systems, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Sara M. Metzler |
| Represented By: | Kelly E. Farnan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Ring Protection LLC | |
| Represented By: | Philip A. Rovner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
