In re: Toptal LLC
Defendant: Bloomberg L.P.
Petitioner: Toptal LLC
Respondent: Jane Lanhee Lee
Case Number: 1:2026mc00223
Filed: May 5, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Presiding Judge: Richard G Andrews
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Miscellaneous Application
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 3, 2026 Filing 14 REDACTED VERSION of #10 Exhibit to a Document by Bloomberg L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Yoch, James)
June 3, 2026 CORRECTING ENTRY: The redacted filing submitted at D.I. 14 has been removed from the docket. Upon review the filing was determined to be incomplet. The submission lacked the captioned cover page. Counsel is to correct the filing and resubmit. (nms)
June 2, 2026 Filing 13 REPLY BRIEF re #1 APPLICATION for the Issuance of a Subpoena Duces Tecum and a Subpoena Ad Testificandum to Jane Lanhee Lee, filed by Toptal LLC. (Farnan, Brian) Modified on 6/3/2026 (nms).
May 29, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Granting #8 MOTION for Leave to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/29/2026. (nms)
May 27, 2026 Opinion or Order SO ORDERED, re #11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Anna J. Hrom, filed by Bloomberg L.P.. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/27/2026. (nms)
May 27, 2026 Remark: The Court's Finance Department has confirmed the $50.00 fee for the Motion for Pro Hac Vice Appearance (D.I. #11 ) was received on 5/26/2026, and assigned Receipt # ADEDC-4977583. (nms)
May 26, 2026 Filing 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Anna J. Hrom - filed by Bloomberg L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Certificate of Service)(Yoch, James)
May 26, 2026 Filing 10 [SEALED] Exhibits 1-2 to #9 Response, by Bloomberg L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Yoch, James) Modified on 5/26/2026 (nms).
May 26, 2026 Filing 9 RESPONSE to #1 Application for Subpoena and Supplement, filed by Bloomberg L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Yoch, James) Modified on 5/26/2026 (nms).
May 26, 2026 Filing 8 Motion for Leave to File Under Seal, by Bloomberg L.P.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Yoch, James) Modified on 5/26/2026 (nms).
May 26, 2026 CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. #8 has been recoded and the docket text corrected. The motion submitted was incorrectly filed as a proposed order at the initial time of filing. (nms)
May 19, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Application for the Issuance of a Subpoena Duces Tecum and a Subpoena Ad Testificandum to Jane Lanhee Lee and (ii) the Court's May 18, 2026 Oral Order with relevant papers filed by Toptal LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
May 18, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORAL ORDER: Petitioner should serve the state court defendant with the relevant papers, and the state court defendant has one week to file a response to the petition and D.I. #5 . Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/18/2026. (nms)
May 15, 2026 Filing 5 SUPPLIMENT in Response to 4 Oral Order, by Toptal LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Farnan, Michael) Modified on 5/15/2026 (nms).
May 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORAL ORDER: The Court has briefly reviewed the application (D.I. #1 ) and the statute. The Court does not see anywhere in the application a citation to authority for the proposition that section 1783 applies to state court litigation. The applicant is requested to submit a brief citing any cases in which a court has analyzed and decided whether the statute applies to state court litigation. Ordered by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/13/2026. (nms)
May 13, 2026 Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms)
May 5, 2026 Filing 3 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Toptal LLC. (oam)
May 5, 2026 Filing 2 DECLARATION of Amy McCann Roller re #1 Application for the Issuance of a Subpoena Duces Tecum and a Subpoena Ad Testificandum to Jane Lanhee Lee (oam)
May 5, 2026 Filing 1 APPLICATION for the Issuance of a Subpoena Duces Tecum and a Subpoena Ad Testificandum to Jane Lanhee Lee (Miscellaneous Filling Fee $52, receipt number ADEDC-4963829) - filed by Toptal LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Proposed Order, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (oam).
May 5, 2026 Remark: Case submitted for routine judicial assignment. (oam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Toptal LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Toptal LLC
Represented By: Michael J. Farnan
Represented By: Brian E. Farnan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jane Lanhee Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bloomberg L.P.
Represented By: James M. Yoch, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?