RED RIVER COAL v. USA
| RED RIVER COAL COMPANY, INC. |
| USA |
| 1:2001cv00441 |
| July 31, 2001 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| George W. Miller |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
PUBLISHED OPINION granting 48 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge George W. Miller. (np3) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER denying 40 Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings. Defendant shall file a motion for judgment by March 1, 2012; plaintiff shall file its response within fourteen days of the date on which defendant's motion is filed; and defendant shall file its reply within seven days of the date on which plaintiff's response is filed. Signed by Judge George W. Miller. (np3) Copy to parties.
|
| Search for this case: RED RIVER COAL v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RED RIVER COAL COMPANY, INC. | |
| Represented By: | John Yates Merrell, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Tara K. Hogan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
