PEOPLES v. USA
| MICHAEL R. PEOPLES |
| USA |
| 1:2005cv00214 |
| February 11, 2005 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| Margaret M. Sweeney |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
PUBLISHED OPINION denying 78 plaintiff's deemed Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record and granting 82 defendant's Cross Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (kb1)
|
|
Filing
53
PUBLISHED OPINION denying 6 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1); denying 6 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Administrative Record; denying 17 Motion for Summary Judgment on the Administrative Record; and remanding case to the Board for Correction of Naval Records. Defendant's status report due by 9/29/2009. Remand period concludes on 12/29/2009. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (kb1)
|
| Search for this case: PEOPLES v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MICHAEL R. PEOPLES | |
| Represented By: | James Robert Klimaski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Armando A. Rodriguez-Feo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
