EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION v. USA
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION |
| USA |
| 1:2009cv00165 |
| March 18, 2009 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| Loren A. Smith |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
Docketed for Administrative Purposes: ORDER denying 106 Motion Lifting Stay. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (jwg) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
102
REPORTED OPINION denying 90 Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (ms) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
48
PUBLISHED OPINION granting 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Sr. Judge Loren A. Smith. (lp1) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying 7 Motion for Transfer Back to the Clerk of Court for Random Reassignment Signed by Sr. Judge Loren A. Smith. (gs)
|
| Search for this case: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | William Stephen Foster, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth David Woodrow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
