KOOPMANN v. USA
Case Number: 1:2009cv00333
Filed: April 10, 2020
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
Nature of Suit: Tax - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 383 REPORTED OPINION denying 365 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (klb) Service on parties made.
December 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 375 REPORTED OPINION granting 319 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 41(b). Signed by Chief Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (klb) Service on parties made.
November 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 373 REPORTED ORDER denying 145 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (srb1) Service on parties made.
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 367 UNREPORTED OPINION denying without prejudice 297 Motion for Reconsideration; granting 307 Motion to Substitute Party; granting 315 Motion to Substitute Party; granting 328 Motion to Substitute Party; granting 341 Motion to Substitute Party. The Clerk is directed to update the docket accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (klb) Service on parties made.
September 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 363 REPORTED OPINION granting 248 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (srb1) Service on parties made.
April 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 136 Re-Docketing of 134 Order for Posting to the Court's Website UNREPORTED ORDER granting 90 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(6). Signed by Senior Judge Victor J. Wolski. (jt1) Service on parties made.
Search for this case: KOOPMANN v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?