P & K CONTRACTING. INC v. USA
P & K CONTRACTING. INC |
USA |
1:2009cv00399 |
June 18, 2009 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
James F. Merow |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 PUBLISHED OPINION granting 44 Defendant's Second Motion for Summary Judgment and denying 47 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for defendant. Signed by Senior Judge James F. Merow. (lae) Copy to parties. |
Filing 34 ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21) is DENIED, without prejudice to its renewal upon further consideration as to the existence of a mutual mistake of fact and any resulting monetary relief. On or before November 8, 2011, counsel shall file a status report(s)proposing a schedule(s) for further proceedings in this matter. Signed by Senior Judge James F. Merow. (lae) Copy to parties. |
Search for this case: P & K CONTRACTING. INC v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: P & K CONTRACTING. INC | |
Represented By: | Carol A. Sigmond |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Kent Christopher Kiffner |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.