SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT v. USA
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
USA |
1:2009cv00587 |
September 4, 2009 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
Susan G. Braden |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 117 REPORTED OPINION granting 108 Motion The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (aw) Copy to parties. |
Filing 102 Corrected PUBLISHED OPINION. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (al) Copy to parties. |
Filing 95 PUBLISHED OPINION. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (al) Copy to parties. Modified on 1/31/2013 - corrected pdf(jt1). |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion for Leave to File Supplemental and Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden.(rr2) |
Search for this case: SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT | |
Represented By: | Timothy R. Macdonald |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Scott Randy Damelin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.