K-LAK CORP. v. USA
K-LAK CORP. |
USA |
1:2009cv00771 |
November 10, 2009 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
Nancy B. Firestone |
Negotiable Instrument |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 PUBLISHED OPINION and ORDER denying 7 Motion for Permanent Injunction; denying 13 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; granting 50 Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record. As the court received no requests for redactions, the opinion is unchanged from the sealed opinion filed March 3, 2011 apart from non-substantive changes to footnote 8. Signed by Judge Nancy B. Firestone. (ek) |
Filing 37 PUBLISHED OPINION: Government's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is DENIED. Government's response to plaintiff's Motion for Judgment and any Cross-Motion due by August 20, 2010. (Opinion originally issued under seal on 7/13/10).Signed by Judge Nancy B. Firestone. (dpk) |
Search for this case: K-LAK CORP. v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: K-LAK CORP. | |
Represented By: | Janine S. Benton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Antonia Ramos Soares |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.