SOFMAN v. USA
Plaintiff: PETER SOFMAN
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2010cv00157
Filed: March 12, 2010
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Victor J. Wolski
Nature of Suit: Tax - Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 268 UNREPORTED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 170 Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) the portions of the Complaint that seek declaratory and injunctive relief. Signed by Judge Thompson M. Dietz. (brs) Service on parties made.
December 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 231 REPORTED OPINION granting 199 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 41(b). Signed by Chief Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (klb) Service on parties made.
November 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 229 UNREPORTED OPINION denying without prejudice 174 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (klb) Service on parties made.
Search for this case: SOFMAN v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PETER SOFMAN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Karen Marie Groen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?