BANNUM, INC. v. USA
Plaintiff: BANNUM, INC.
Defendant: USA
Intervenor_defendant: DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.
Case Number: 1:2010cv00479
Filed: July 26, 2010
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Susan G. Braden
Nature of Suit: Contract - (Post Award) Injunction
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 43 PUBLISHED MEMORANDUM OPINION and FINAL ORDER. (Reissuance of 12/20/10 Memorandum Opinion and Final Order for Publication). Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (np1)

Search for this case: BANNUM, INC. v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BANNUM, INC.
Represented By: Joseph A. Camardo, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Paul Davis Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor_defendant: DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.
Represented By: Alexander D. Tomaszczuk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?