ADKINS et al v. USA
| CHARLES P. ADKINS and JANE E. ADKINS |
| USA |
| 1:2010cv00851 |
| December 10, 2010 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| Margaret M. Sweeney |
| Tax - Income, Individual |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
199
REPORTED OPINION granting in part and denying in part 171 Motion for Sanctions or, in the Alternative, for Attorney's Fees. The motion for sanctions is denied. The alternative motion for attorney's fees is granted. Plaintiffs are entitled to an award of attorney's fees under I.R.C. § 7430 in the amount of $60,800.60. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (kb1)
|
|
Filing
194
ORDER granting 193 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. If they deem it necessary, plaintiffs may exceed the page limit by the same number of pages for their reply. Pursuant to RCFC 54(d)(2)(D)(ii), plaintiffs shall file their reply in support of 171 Motion for Attorney Fees and sanctions by 3/4/2021. Signed by Senior Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (kb1)
|
|
Filing
157
REPORTED OPINION. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (kb1)
|
|
Filing
124
REPORTED OPINION. The court dismisses plaintiffs' complaint with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (kb1)
|
|
Filing
107
UNREPORTED ORDER denying 102 Motion to Reopen Case. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (kb1)
|
|
Filing
51
PUBLISHED OPINION denying 33 Motion for Summary Judgment and granting in part and denying in part 35 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Joint Status Report due by 1/17/2014. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (kb1)
|
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
