MEIDL v. USA
NATHAN T. MEIDL |
USA |
1:2011cv00090 |
February 10, 2011 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
Susan G. Braden |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 REPORTED OPINION denying 24 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; granting 27 Cross Motion. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (cm) Copy to parties. |
Filing 21 ORDER REMANDING case to Department of the Army. Agency Decision due by 7/24/2013. Status Report due by 4/25/2013 Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (mk) Copy to parties. |
Filing 13 ORDER denying 10 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record and denying 11 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record. The case is remanded to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The case is stayed for the duration of the remand proceedings. Signed by Judge Susan G. Braden. (np1) Copy to parties. |
Search for this case: MEIDL v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: NATHAN T. MEIDL | |
Represented By: | Jason Ellis Perry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Sheryl Lynn Floyd |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.