RETURN MAIL, INC v. USA
RETURN MAIL, INC |
USA |
1:2011cv00130 |
February 28, 2011 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
James F. Merow |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 208 REPORTED OPINION on 169 MOTION for Summary Judgment of Invalidity under 35 USC 101 filed by USA, 171 MOTION for Summary Judgment Under §§ 305 and 102 filed by USA, 172 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defen dant The United States' Section 101 Affirmative Defense filed by RETURN MAIL, INC., and 173 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment on Defendant's Section 305 Affirmative Defense filed by RETURN MAIL, INC.; granting 169 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 171 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 172 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 173 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow. (ac) |
Filing 197 REPORTED OPINION AND ORDER granting 188 Motion for Prompt Payment; granting in part 189 Motion for Reconsideration; denying 190 Cross-Motion for Stay of Payment. Signed by Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow. (klg) |
Filing 166 REPORTED OPINION granting in part and denying in part 155 Motion to Preclude Defendant's Use of Previously Withheld Documents. Signed by Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow. (jjk) |
Filing 150 REPORTED OPINION granting 135 Motion to Amend Schedule. Defendant's Amended Invalidity Contentions due by 3/10/2021. Signed by Senior Judge Charles F. Lettow. (jjk) |
Filing 76 UNREPORTED ORDER suspending ruling on 60 Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending CBM Review by the PTAB. Within 20 days following PTAB's decision, were it to initiate a CBM review with respect to asserted claims 39- 44 of the 39;548 Patent, absent agreement by the parties as to the disposition of the pending motion for a stay, the parties shall file supplemental briefs, not to exceed 10 pages, relative to the impact, if any, of the PTAB's decision on the issue of a stay. Signed by Senior Judge James F. Merow. (lae) Copy to parties. |
Filing 54 ORDER (Markman) re claims construction. Signed by Senior Judge James F. Merow. (lae) Copy to parties. |
Filing 45 REISSUE OF ORDER filed under seal on October 22, 2012. Signed by Senior Judge James F. Merow. (lae) Copy to parties. |
Search for this case: RETURN MAIL, INC v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RETURN MAIL, INC | |
Represented By: | Richard L. Rainey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | John Andrew Hudalla |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.