SUFI NETWORK SERVICES, INC. v. USA
SUFI NETWORK SERVICES, INC. |
USA |
1:2011cv00804 |
November 30, 2011 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
Thomas C. Wheeler |
Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 90 REPORTED OPINION granting 79 Motion for Attorney Fees. Joint Status Report due by 11/18/2016. Signed by Judge Thomas C. Wheeler. (ad) Copy to parties. |
Filing 74 REPORTED OPINION The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Thomas C. Wheeler. (jf) Copy to parties. |
Filing 41 PUBLISHED OPINION granting in part and denying in part 13 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Thomas C. Wheeler. (md) Copy to parties. |
Search for this case: SUFI NETWORK SERVICES, INC. v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: SUFI NETWORK SERVICES, INC. | |
Represented By: | Frederick W. Claybrook, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Douglas Thomas Hoffman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.