AEROPLATE CORP. v. USA
Plaintiff: AEROPLATE CORP.
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2012cv00377
Filed: June 14, 2012
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Margaret M. Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 62 UNREPORTED ORDER: On July 14, 2014, the Clerk of Court received a Notice of Lien in each of the above captioned cases from California Bank and Turst. There are no provision in the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims for the filing of a lien notice. Accordingly, the court directs the Clerk of Court to return the lien notices to the bank, unfiled. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (ac7) Copy to parties.
June 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 PUBLISHED OPINION denying 21 MOTION to Intervene. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (kb1)
Search for this case: AEROPLATE CORP. v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: AEROPLATE CORP.
Represented By: William Lee Bruckner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Jessica R. Toplin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?