SIMS v. USA
JACQUELINE R. SIMS |
USA |
1:2013cv00494 |
July 19, 2013 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
None |
Lynn J. Bush |
Contract - (Pre Award) Injunctions |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 PUBLISHED OPINION denying 8 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; granting 9 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; granting 15 Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Lynn J. Bush. (TQ) Copy to parties. |
Filing 13 ORDER denying 11 Motion to Stay. Plaintiff's Motion to Supplement the AR, if any, shall be filed by 5:00pm, 9/3/2013; Plaintiff's Response/Reply to Defendant's Cross Motion for Judgment on the AR remains du e to be filed by 5:00pm, 9/3/2013; Defendant's Reply remains due to be filed by 5:00pm, 9/10 and shall include a response to any motion to supplement the AR filed by plaintiff in this matter. Signed by Judge Lynn J. Bush. (TQ) Copy to parties. |
Search for this case: SIMS v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JACQUELINE R. SIMS | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Luke Arthur Edward Pazicky |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.