COOK v. USA
RONALD C. COOK |
USA |
1:2013cv00523 |
July 29, 2013 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
None |
Margaret M. Sweeney |
Military Pay - Retirement |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 REPORTED OPINION denying 20 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6); granting in part and denying in part 20 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; granting in part and denying in part 24 Cross-Motion for Judgment on the Administ rative Record; and denying as moot 34 Motion to Strike. The case is remanded to the Army for the correction of plaintiff's military records. Remand period terminates on 4/21/2016. Defendant shall file a status report every 90 days, with the first one due by 1/19/2016. RCFC 52.2(f)(1) notices due within 30 days of the Army's filing of documentation that it has complied with the court's instructions. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (kb1) |
Search for this case: COOK v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: RONALD C. COOK | |
Represented By: | Thomas Alan Moore |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Represented By: | Douglas Glenn Edelschick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.