GENERAL MILLS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES v. USA
Plaintiff: GENERAL MILLS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2014cv00089
Filed: January 30, 2014
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Patricia E. Campbell-Smith
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 REPORTED OPINION (Corrected Opinion). This is a corrected version of the opinion issued October 14, 2015, ECF No. 35, and includes both the Errata the court issued on October 14, 2015, ECF No. 36, and corrections to two typographical errors, as requested by defendant, ECF No. 37. The court made no other changes to the opinion. JPSR due by 11/6/2015. Signed by Chief Judge Patricia E. Campbell-Smith. (rl) Copy to parties.
Search for this case: GENERAL MILLS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GENERAL MILLS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Represented By: Sheri Ann Dillon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Bart Duncan Jeffress
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?